DEAR MISS MANNERS: How does one diplomatically, yet adamantly, state that guests should not bring a dish to supplement your holiday event?
I’m frequently asked, “What can I bring?” I always reply, “Your good cheer and appetite, please!” Inevitably, friends will show up with their award-winning dish and promptly put it on the serving line.
Unfortunately, there is the potential that their contribution is tainted -- and being the host, the unfortunate results are on me. The well-being of my guests is essential.
GENTLE READER: The idea that private dinner parties are always done cooperatively has now become so firmly ingrained in the American mind that it has taken on a whether-the-hosts-like-it-or-not urgency.
And this goes double on holidays, when cooperative meals are so common that no one believes in an exception. That there are hosts who prefer to provide all the refreshments -- or are infuriated to have others messing in their kitchens -- is dismissed as insincere politeness.
To justify stopping this, you needn’t resort to invoking that dreadful scenario in which guests bring lethal treats and you are left responsible for murder. It is quite enough that it is your house, and you do not want to share the hostly duty of providing the dinner.
But as your mild little response is ignored, Miss Manners will have to provide you with something clearer: “Thank you, but I am doing the entire dinner, and I can’t serve anything else.” Or: “Please don’t. I appreciate the offer, but it would only go to waste.”
One more option: "I’m sorry, but the chef absolutely forbids any contributions to the meal." This last one is the strongest because chefs seem to hold the last positions that are still able to command authority.
Never mind that, in this case, you happen to be the chef.