Now that it’s 2021, required minimum distributions (RMDs) are back.

RMDs were suspended for the year 2020 by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, but no longer.

If you were taking RMDs before 2020, you’ll have to resume your RMDs now. As a reminder, RMDs apply to traditional IRAs (individual retirement accounts) and other tax-deferred accounts. Roth IRAs are not subject to RMD requirements during the Roth IRA owner’s lifetime. As another reminder, I caution you to speak with your accountant or tax adviser before taking RMDs.

Let’s go through a few simple examples, assuming you have a single IRA that was worth $1 million on 12/31/2020. That’s the measuring date for 2021 RMDs.

The official guide to RMDs is IRS Pub. 590-B, “Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)” (tinyurl.com/yyvsbdtj). While the new 2020 version of Pub. 590-B is not out yet, the divisors have not changed from 2019.

Assume you are 84 years old. You’ll find your RMD divisor (“Distribution Period”) of 15.5 in “Table III (Uniform Lifetime)” of Pub. 590-B (Appendix B). Based on that divisor, your 2021 RMD will be $64,516.13, or 6.45% of $1 million. That’s the amount that must be withdrawn before 12/31/2021.

Another divisor applies if your spouse is your sole beneficiary and he or she is more than 10 years younger. See Table II of Appendix B.

As pointed out by W.F., a reader of this column, those born in 1949 need some special help understanding RMD rules as a result of the SECURE (Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement) Act. Those who were born in the first half of the year (Jan. 1 through June 30, 1949) turned 70 1/2 in 2019, before the adoption of the SECURE Act. They became subject to RMD rules in 2019.

Those born in the second half of 1949 (July 1 through Dec. 31, 1949) are governed by the SECURE Act’s age 72 rule. For instance, W.F.’s birthday is in September of 1949. He is turning 72 this year, so he will need to take a 2021 RMD. The Table III divisor for age 72 is 25.6, 3.9% of the 12/31/2020 balance.

Keep in mind that if you are taking your very first RMD in 2021 because you are 72 (having been born in the last half of 1949), a special rule applies to you. In that case (your very first RMD), you can choose to take two RMDs in 2022 instead of one in 2021 and another in 2022. That is, you can take your first RMD based on 12/31/2020 values by 12/31/2021 or, if you choose, you can delay that very first RMD to the first quarter of 2022 (by 4/1/2022). But that means you will be taking two RMDs in 2022: your 2021 RMD based on your 12/31/2020 values and your 2022 RMD based on your 12/31/2021 values. Be sure to talk with your accountant before deciding on a course of action for your first RMD.

If you were born anytime in 1950, you can take a breather. RMDs don’t apply to you -- yet. You will turn 72 in 2022.

Before signing off, let me share a resource with you -- a list of 2021 limits for traditional IRAs, Roth IRA and employer retirement accounts (tinyurl.com/y6tb7aw5). The resource, made available by Brentmark, also reproduces the Uniform Lifetime Table that we discussed in this column. Brentmark is a provider of calculation software for financial, estate, retirement and charitable planning.

Check out IRS resources as well, including those relating to RMDs (tinyurl.com/zn7ckor and tinyurl.com/gr7dhap) and IRAs (tinyurl.com/ycju3hmw).

Julie Jason, JD, LLM, a personal money manager (Jackson, Grant Investment Advisers Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut) and award-winning author, welcomes your questions/comments (readers@juliejason.com). Please visit www.juliejason.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION

Now that it’s the start of a fresh new year, I’m hoping you have a few financial resolutions ready to go. If you’re resolving to save more, you are not alone. “Save more money” is the top financial resolution for next year among those considering a resolution, according to the recently released Fidelity 2021 Financial Resolutions Study (tinyurl.com/y95r66t6).

I like that, but I’d like it even better if your resolution included what you wanted to do with the money you saved, along with a plan for the future.

In my world of portfolio management, I’d like you to “save more and invest the savings for the future.” The future might be preparing for retirement (my favorite goal for anyone who wants to retire someday).

If you’re not investing that savings, you might need it to pay off debt, a worthy goal (43% chose “pay down debt” as their top resolution in the Fidelity study). Or, you might want to consume the savings by purchasing something you would like to have: a TV, a new car or, when the time is right, a much-needed post-COVID-19 vacation.

No matter what your personal situation calls for, consider this: It’s not an all-or-nothing calculus. Your savings can have multiple goals. For example: 1/2 to retirement; 1/4 to paying off student loan debt; 1/4 for purchases. Of course, the figures will depend on your age and your circumstances, all the foundation of a personal financial plan.

Before going any further, let me ask you: How have you done with financial resolutions in the past? Did you stick to them? Did they cause you to start thinking differently about saving and investing for the future, and the importance of a big-picture financial plan? That would be the biggest benefit of putting a financial resolution in play.

When asked by Fidelity, 77% of those surveyed who worked with a financial professional said they were able to stick to their financial resolution in 2020, compared with 50% of those who did not have a financial professional.

That’s an interesting tidbit. I can definitely see the benefit of getting your financial professional on board to help you with saving and investing for retirement -- and creating a plan for the future.

It’s certainly worth a talk: “I’m saving for retirement this year. Help me set up a plan that will make it easy for me to not only automate the savings but also to invest wisely for the future.”

Finally, we all have to admit that this new year is different. COVID-19 will not disappear overnight, and in fact, COVID-19’s impact on the economy is the biggest financial worry for 46% of those surveyed. That’s well ahead of those who cited unexpected expenses (35%) or the rising cost of food and other day-to-day essential items (34%).

It can be tempting to skip resolutions altogether and wait out the virus.

I encourage you, however, to engage now.

Times may not be as bad as they may seem. A majority (72%) of those surveyed by Fidelity are confident they will be in a better financial position in 2021 than they were in 2020.

A financial resolution is the start of something good -- a move in the right direction toward a plan of action that can help a family survive and thrive in the best of times and the worst of times.

And, as always when planning is involved, there is no better time than now to get going on those goals.

DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION

Julie Jason, JD, LLM, a personal money manager (Jackson, Grant Investment Advisers Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut) and award-winning author, welcomes your questions/comments (readers@juliejason.com). Please visit www.juliejason.com.

The importance of having savings certainly has been brought to the forefront during the COVID-19 pandemic, as many people found themselves living on, and often exhausting, their emergency savings due to illness or job loss.

For example, a study released in September (tinyurl.com/y6k52dkm) by SimplyWise, a technology company that offers resources related to retirement and Social Security, found that 45% of workers who were furloughed or unemployed due to the pandemic could not last a month living off their savings, with 26% saying they could not make it two weeks.

So the question is: Does having even a small amount of savings, say $250, make a difference? The answer is yes, according to “Savings: A Little Can Make a Big Difference.”

The study, which focused on lower-income families, was recently published by the FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) Investor Education Foundation and SaverLife, a nonprofit company that seeks to build financial security for working families.

According to the study, “People who were unable to maintain a savings balance above $250 were 71% more likely to have moved in the past five years for financial reasons versus people who were able to sustain a balance above $250.”

When the results were controlled for factors like household income, gender, age, education, marital status and the presence of dependents, those who were “unable to maintain a balance above $250 were still 29% more likely to have moved for financial reasons.”

To create the study, which can be found at tinyurl.com/ybhl596j, researchers reviewed the three-month average daily savings balances for 687 participating SaverLife members, then combined the data with survey information that looked at the members’ attitudes and behaviors when it came to finances.

Eighty-three percent of those surveyed who were unable to keep a savings balance of more than $100 were more likely to use “high-cost borrowing,” such as pawn shops, auto—title loans, refund advances and payday loans, when compared with those having savings above $100. Adding in the control factors, those who could not maintain the $100 balance were 39% more likely to use high-cost borrowing.

As might be expected, those who were able to maintain a savings of more than $100 were 61% more likely to say they were financially satisfied (29% when using the control factors) than those who were unable to maintain the $100 balance.

“[T]his new study underscores the need for innovative, low-barrier savings products that help financially struggling households build and maintain savings,” FINRA Foundation President Gerri Walsh said. “We now know that even a very modest savings cushion correlates with significant life improvements.”

One of the recommendations included in the study urged “all organizations to encourage saving money even in the smallest of increments. Many financial education programs equate adequate emergency savings with three months of living expenses. That guidance may work for some people, but isn’t always achievable for low-income households. This study suggests that even a very modest savings cushion correlates with major life improvements.”

Indeed, creating and maintaining a “savings cushion” is an important financial goal for the new year. Just a few hundred dollars can make a difference.

Julie Jason, JD, LLM, a personal money manager (Jackson, Grant Investment Advisers Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut) and award-winning author, welcomes your questions/comments (readers@juliejason.com). Please visit www.juliejason.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION