life

Thanks Still Go to Wives

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | April 15th, 2007

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Over the course of many years, because of my professional and social activities, I have been privileged to be invited to lunches and dinners at the White House, the governor's manson and other such venues. On a trip to Europe, I was a guest at a dinner at the residence of our ambassador to a major European country. Since the ambassador and his wife are friends, I immediately sent a thank you note to the ambassador's wife, as I have always been taught to do.

Several friends said that in this instance and the other official entertainments, I should have sent my thank you to the ambassador, president, governor, etc., and not to their wives.

What is your opinion and direction?

GENTLE READER: Your friends gave you an opinion; Miss Manners can direct you to what is correct. Etiquette, especially at the level of protocol, is not something you can figure out for yourself by deciding what ought to be done without knowing what is customarily done, and therefore expected.

When you are on official business, it is perfectly true that the male office holder is the person responsible for your invitation, and his wife is a private citizen. Nevertheless, she is considered the hostess, to whom the letter of thanks should be addressed.

Does it follow that when you are entertained by a female office holder, you should write to her husband? No. The lady is still considered the hostess.

Is this fair (as your friends would argue)? Is it logical? No. Should it change?

Possibly. After government has fully recognized the injustice of expecting wives to run the protocol side of such jobs for free or meager pay, they may choose not to attend official events. But if they do, treating them as presiding hostesses may be one of those anachronistic courtesies that we maintain simply because it feels rude not to do so.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband and I are both professors at a very small, private liberal arts college (about 750 students). Because of its size, we get to really know and love many students!

We get invited to many graduation parties and receptions, and always manage to get to every party and spend a few minutes conversing with and congratulating the graduate. I love finding just the right card for each student, and I personalize each one for him/her.

However, we cannot afford to give everyone a gift. A friend of mine says my husband and I should not attend the parties if we do not bring a gift. Is she right?

GENTLE READER: That there is an admission charge to parties? No. Oddly enough, guests are supposed to be invited because the hosts want the pleasure of their company.

Although the world is unfortunately full of people who grasp for more, Miss Manners doubts that this is the case here. What you and your husband have presumably already given these students is of inestimable value, and your continued interest doubtless confers a pleasure beyond that of any trinket.

:

life

Too Many Cooks Spoil the Visit

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | April 12th, 2007

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband and I have friends that stay with us at least one week ?each year, ?and although we enjoy their company, ?we desperately need your advice. We live in a small house and therefore it is impossible for more than two people to engage in ?prep work and cooking.

Our friends enjoy cooking as much as we do, and they insist on taking ?over our kitchen and preparing meals without our consent. We have tried ?sharing the experience, but each time it resulted in our being pushed out of the room.

It is stressful to plan meals because they want to ?participate in that, as well. They have no dietary restrictions, only palate ?restrictions, and ?despite the fact that none of us are professional chefs, and we entertain on a regular basis, ?we feel insulted that when it comes to this couple, our skills don't appear to cut the cake.

What does one do when guests feel comfortable whipping up meals, going ?through cupboards looking for ingredients, and taking cooking utensils ?out of our hands while forcibly insisting on preparing our meals?

I ?have made ?comments such as, "Oh please, allow me to cook for you. I enjoy it!" ?However ?my words are of no consequence. Are we being too controlling, or is it common ?for people to feel a bit territorial when it comes to kitchens?

GENTLE READER: So many hosts complain to Miss Manners that their guests won't lift a finger that she might be expected to tell you to be grateful. But don't worry. She understands why you must feel like braining these good people with one of your own frying pans.

It is not only because it would be rude and violent that you cannot clobber them. It is because of those good intentions.

While guests are supposed to be helpful, they are also supposed to accept the hosts' way of doing things. (And why shouldn't you feel territorial? It's your territory -- the whole house is.)

Miss Manners is afraid that you cannot entirely prevent them from offering their form of reciprocation. But you can get it under control if you out-gracious them.

Before they arrive, tell them that the cupboard is bare, but that you are shopping and need to know what they want in case they want to cook one of their lovely meals. You will then set aside a day for them to cook, and have the ingredients they need on the counter. Then pour yourself a drink and stay out -- or better yet, go out and take a walk -- while they are busy.

But you will also insist that they do the same -- go have a drink elsewhere while you cook, because the kitchen is so small it makes you nervous to have company there. Keep saying, "No, no, I want you to relax," as you push them out the kitchen door. And oh, yes -- keep your hands off the frying pan.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am getting married soon and I was wondering what the etiquette was for wedding cake toppers. Is it important to look like the cake topper? Is it important for the flowers on the topper to look like my fiance's flowers?

GENTLE READER: It is not necessary for bridal couples to make themselves resemble icing, although Miss Manners has observed that a not-inconsiderable number of them do.

Contrary to what the wedding industry may tell you, the decorative elements of weddings are not regulated by etiquette. You can even be legally married without choosing a color scheme. So have the flowers whatever color you like, or have figures that represent you or don't; anything that is not actually unappetizing is correct.

:

life

Expectant Mother Seeks Slave Labor

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | April 10th, 2007

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I received an e-mail from an acquaintance who is recently married and intentionally pregnant, asking if I might like "to be the coordinator of some support for us once the little one emerges. It would involve checking in with us on a regular basis about what kind of support we could use, and then a fair amount of e-mailing and phone calling (probably a few phone calls and/or e-mails a day) and making some sort of calendar to keep track of what, who and when. Needless to say, it would be a fantastic gift."

The over 50 friends and family members who also got this email were told, "If you don't want to organize but are interested in being on the help contact list, some suggestions we have been given for ways to be supportive are: meal drop off every other day or so, grocery shopping, helping clean or organize around the house (dishes, laundry, etc.). We are looking forward to sharing this immense transition with all of you."

Is their request appropriate? Worth noting is that both sets of the couple's parent are financially very well off and live within 10 miles of them. It seems that they are asking their friends to take on the job of volunteer nanny.

Several of my own friends and family read the e-mail and threatened to write you personally if I didn't. Some were even tempted to scold the couple directly. Any words of wisdom you care to impart?

GENTLE READER: Words would fail Miss Manners, had she not long been prepared by observing -- and trying valiantly to stem -- the rapid growth of shamelessness.

Weddings and childbirth are now commonly associated with demands for goods and services. Rather than risk depending on the good will of their relatives and friends, the principals demand to be given showers and parties, issue orders for tasks, and use registries to choose their own presents or frankly request cash. Enlisting others to become their servants, cleaning house, supplying meals and rounding up still more free help is only the obvious next step.

As with your acquaintance, they assume it will be taken as an honor to share -- share the costs and the work, that is, while they revel in the glory.

Why anyone goes along with this is beyond Miss Manners' understanding. No, you cannot scold such people, much as they deserve it. But you can ignore them, as you would any other outrageous solicitation, and if everyone did perhaps this abominable attitude would be supressed.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: What are the appropriate steps to take when one accidentally accepts two invitations for the ?same day? It doesn't happen often, maybe once every couple years, but I recently accepted ?an invite to a dinner party only to remember a couple days later that I'd already promised to ?attend another event.

GENTLE READER: And you want to go to the second one, don't you? Miss Manners thinks that because you aren't already on the telephone to the second host, apologizing profusely for not having checked your calendar, sobbing about how you hate to miss it, and so on.

No, you can't do that to the first host, because he asked you first. Besides, more time has passed since you accepted that invitation than the second one, so it wouldn't be plausible. You must stick with the first host and grovel your apologies to the second one.

:

Next up: More trusted advice from...

  • 7 Day Menu Planner for March 26, 2023
  • 7 Day Menu Planner for March 19, 2023
  • 7 Day Menu Planner for March 12, 2023
  • Taking a Life-Changing Risk
  • Reversing the Rise in Dangerous Driving
  • The Crazy World of Summer Camp Signups
  • Is My Self-Care Selfish?
  • Transportable Tranquility
  • New Year, New Goal: To Be Happy
UExpressLifeParentingHomePetsHealthAstrologyOdditiesA-Z
AboutContactSubmissionsTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
©2023 Andrews McMeel Universal