DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I’m writing to you after having just ended another relationship, and I keep getting the same feedback from women I date: that I’m too intense, too argumentative and dismissive and that I always have to be right. This is enough of a recurring issue that I can’t seem to hold on to a relationship for more than a few months before my girlfriend and I end up having this fight.
For context, I don’t think of myself as combative, I just enjoy talking about ideas and challenging people’s opinions. I have always had a strong personality, I pride myself in my education, I like deep conversations, not small talk. But apparently, the women I date don’t see it that way.
One ex told me I always had to “win” every discussion. For example, we once spent an entire dinner debating whether streaming services have ruined music, and she got upset when I picked apart her points, pointed out that mathematically there’s a pattern to a pop hit and told her she “didn’t understand the economics of the industry.” I thought we were just having a lively debate, but she said it felt like I was trying to prove she was stupid.
Another woman said I was “judgmental” because I teased her about her taste in music and movies. She loved pop songs and romantic comedies, and I couldn’t resist pointing out how formulaic they were. I thought I was being funny and analytical; she said I made her feel small and defensive.
My most recent ex told me that I was always shooting down her ideas and treating her like she was stupid or foolish, no matter what she suggested. I don’t recall anything like this at all, if I’m being honest.
I’ve also been told I come off as “intense” because I always have to be doing something meaningful—reading, learning, improving. If a girlfriend just wants to watch a reality show or scroll on her phone, I find myself asking why she’s wasting her time. I honestly don’t mean to insult anyone, but apparently that’s how it comes across.
So here I am, genuinely trying to understand: am I just dating the wrong people, or is this something I need to work on? Am I just, as my last ex accused me, an a--hole who needs to disagree with everyone?
How can I be passionate and thoughtful without coming across as condescending or exhausting?
Sincerely,
Too Much To Love (Maybe)
DEAR TOO MUCH TO LOVE (MAYBE): There’s a saying that comes up a lot around here, TMTL: if you meet one person who calls you a horse, you met a crazy person. If four people call you a horse, maybe it’s time to get fitted for a saddle.
You’ve had several exes calling you a horse in a row, and apparently for the same reason every time. Sounds to me like it’s time to go to the Feed and Seed and see what the fall dressage line looks like.
I’ll be honest, TMTL, whenever I hear someone describe themselves as having “a strong personality”, what I hear is “I bulldoze my way through life and then wonder why people don’t thank me for it.” 9 times out of 10, this isn’t coming from a place of self-awareness as much as a place of pride. Which makes sense in as much as it’s another example of “traits men admire in other men” that, strangely enough, women don’t appreciate. And frankly, it’s also a trait that men admire in other men… until they’re on the receiving end of it. Everyone loves the concept of the alpha male until they have to deal with the so-called alpha male, at which point folks understand that having every conversation be a fight for dominance is f--king exhausting.
That’s what’s going on here and why you’ve got a string of exes all singing the same song: you sound like you’re exhausting to deal with and, quite frankly, it sounds like you are completely unaware of how this comes across to people who have to deal with it on a daily basis. ��Some of this should be obvious if you think about it from someone else’s perspective, but I want to focus on one that I don’t think you realize you’re doing, first. It’s a little trickier to demonstrate, seeing as you’re apparently between relationships but do your best to think back: how many times have you dismissed something your exes suggested or brought up out of hand, without even thinking about it? No moment of consideration, no careful thought, just an immediate, knee-jerk response of “nah”, regardless of what the proposal was. And how many times have you actually taken your exes’ side in an argument or on an issue she’s having that doesn’t involve you?��The odds are good that you do this frequently and likely without realizing it – hence your own comment about how this isn’t how you remember things going down. In fact, many men don’t realize how often they do this until someone brings it to their attention. It’s behavior that’s so embedded that you (the general “you”) don’t realize that you’re doing it until you start consciously paying attention to how you’re responding.
It’s an insidious behavior that undermines your connection with your partner by making them feel like their interests, thoughts or experiences are constantly being dismissed by someone who should, in theory, have their back. It takes very time before dismissal starts feeling like contempt, which is one of the Four Horsemen of relationship extinction events.
And believe me, this is very much a “yes, all men” kind of thing. I didn’t realize how often I’ve done this until I got called out on it, and damn that was an eye-opener.
But while we’re talking about self-awareness, here’s another question: how often have you ever conceded a point or “lost” one of the “lively” debates you’ve had with your exes? When is the last time, if ever, you found that your ex was right or made a better case for their opinion and you had to reconsider yours?
While you’re pondering that, let me explain precisely why your exes get tired of your “lively debates”: it’s that whole “dismissal turning to contempt” issue I mentioned before. There’s a difference between a lively debate between friends and just outright telling a person that they suck and their opinions suck. To indulge with a pop-culture comparison, it’s the difference between Wallace Shawn and Andre Gregory in My Dinner with Andre talking about life and philosophy and their experiences, and Jack Black just s--tting on people’s musical taste in High Fidelity. Shawn and Gregory may not agree, but it doesn’t feel like Gregory is actively demeaning Shawn, who has a different view (and also, a much less lavish lifestyle). Jack Black’s character, on the other hand, just wants everyone to know that he is the Arbiter of Good Taste and if you listen to anything that is outside of his personal pantheon, you’re a loser and a sheep.
Even in the examples you mention, you aren’t saying “here’s why I don’t enjoy top-40 pop” or “This television show doesn’t hold my interest”, you’re saying “these things are objectively bad and you’re a lesser person for enjoying them.” Even when you allow for actual facts – streaming has been bad for music because of how bad a deal it is for musicians – you’re not criticizing streaming, you’re criticizing your ex.
The same thing with reality shows or rom-coms and the like. When you call them brain rot or formulaic, you’re accusing the person you’re dating of being stupid. The comparison you make about “relentless self-improvement” to “mindlessly scrolling” is a perfect example. What you’re doing is telling the other person that not being exactly like you is a moral failing. Leaving aside that being formulaic or following tropes doesn’t make something bad, there’s nothing wrong with enjoying something mindless. I don’t know if you noticed but s--t’s pretty dire right now. The country’s sliding towards fascism, the world economy is in freefall, masked goons are snatching people off the streets and tens of millions of people are on the brink of starvation in the US alone. Finding an opportunity to relax and enjoy some brain candy isn’t wasting one’s time, it’s recouping. It’s giving oneself a chance to relax, re-energize and avoid burnout. S--t, even the hardest of hard-core gym bros understand that you need rest days in order to recover and not sabotage your gains.��Those moments of not needing to grind, hustle or constantly think about the trash fire we’re living in is part of how people are able to continue surviving and growing and changing things. There’s a reason why “morale officer” is a vital part of the armed forces. ��The fact that it doesn’t fit into your world view of “improvement” or “challenging yourself” doesn’t make it bad. The fact that it’s something that you don’t see as being “important”, “valuable” or “insightful” doesn’t make it worth less. That’s a classic example of “what you like is extraneous trash, what I like is important”, especially when it aligns with gendered stereotypes; it’s a little like how computer programing was considered “women’s work”… right up until computers came into wider use and were an important part of the economy.
But just as importantly, something doesn’t need to be practical to be valued or worthwhile. Enjoying something because it’s lightweight and fluffy hurts precisely nobody. You’re certainly free to not like it and to not engage with it. But the fact that you don’t care for it doesn’t make it ok to s--t on someone else for enjoying it. If you want to stop getting dumped for being a snobbish and argumentative asshat, you might want to consider adopting a stance of “it’s not for me” or “I’m not the target market” instead of declaring that it’s hot garbage for garbage people.
If you want to “debate” something or “challenge people’s opinions” on pop culture, maybe you should come to it from a place of curiosity instead – what do they enjoy about it, what about it speaks to them, what do they get from it? If you just want to talk trash about it, that’s fine – you can do that with like-minded friends. I enjoy having a Hallmark Christmas movie snark-a-thon with friends; I’ve even recorded live-react podcasts with friends about it. But I’m not going to go out of my way to tell my friends who unironically enjoy them that they’re dumb for watching it. The most I’ll do is share the sort of gentle, knowing ribbing from people who clearly love it – the difference between CinemaSins dumping on Star Trek and Lower Decks doing it. At least then, it’s coming from a place of affection, not disdain.
And this is the reason why you keep having these issues: you’re coming from a place of disdain and dismissal, telling people you supposedly care about that what they like is bad and they’re bad for liking it. If you want to actually have a relationship that lasts, start coming to things from a place of “It’s not for me, but I’m glad you dig it.” Otherwise, you’re just going to have more people pointing out how profound of an a--hole you’re being as they walk out the door. Again.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com