DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I’ve a situation that’s been bugging me for a while now. I’m a 38-year-old guy, pretty well put-together, decent job, in decent shape, emotionally intelligent, and I know how to treat people well. I’m not out here looking for some kind of validation, but I’ve been in the dating game long enough to know when something just doesn’t add up.
Here’s the issue: I seem to only ever attract women who aren’t my type and certainly not people I would choose for a date. The women who seem to be the most into me are the ones I have zero attraction to. They’re co-workers, casual friends and friends of friends, people I spend time with and talk to but I’m not interested in, yet they are clearly VERY into me. They’re the ones who text me first, make plans, go out of their way to spend time with me. I don’t get it. There’s no spark, no connection, and I’m not exactly doing anything to encourage them. I’m not going to pretend to be someone I’m not just to make someone feel good. I talk to them normally, I’m polite and friendly and I make all the appropriate noises when they tell me about their day, but I’m not giving them any signals.
The women I actually like? It’s a nightmare. It takes a ton of work on my part to keep the conversation going and I’m always feeling like I have to chase after them to make plans. I’m having to propose dates weeks or months in advance if I have any hope of fitting into their suddenly packed schedules and all the traveling they have to do for work or family. If we DO have plans, it’s a coin flip as to whether we’re actually going to go out or if something “comes up” at the last minute. These are all women I’ve matched with on dating apps or met at speed dating events or who we specifically talked about going on a date, so it’s not just that I’m hitting on women at random. I’m making this effort but they treat me like I’m just one guy in a long list of options. I feel like I’m the one constantly doing all the chasing, trying to impress, trying to make something happen, and it’s exhausting. It’s like I’m playing hard to get, but for the wrong reasons. Meanwhile, the women I’m not remotely interested in are practically throwing themselves at me. It’s maddening.
I’ve had my share of relationships. Two lasted more than a year, a couple of short-term ones that didn’t work out. I’m not afraid of commitment, I’m not some no-b--ches internet incel dweeb who doesn’t know what he’s doing and I put in a lot of work to be and look my best. I’m just trying to figure out why the women I want seem to be so hard to reach, while the ones I don’t are the ones practically camped outside my door.
This has been going on for YEARS and frankly, it’s messing with my head. What does it say that these women who I don’t like think they have a shot with me, but the ones I know are right for me are treating me like I’m an option at best?
At this point, I feel like I’m out here doing everything right and still getting nowhere. Any advice would be appreciated because, honestly, I’m getting pretty sick of the whole thing.
Sincerely,
Frustrated, Frantic and Fed Up
DEAR FRUSTRATED, FRANTIC AND FED UP: You’re in luck, F3. A lot of the time, I’d suggest that maybe the problem is illustrated by calling other people “no b--ches internet incel dweebs” and your overall attitude of “what does it say that about me that these uggos think they have a chance?” and call it a day.
Recently, however, I’ve been working with a few clients who have been having issues with chasing after women who never seem to have time for them, or whose type don’t seem to dig them back, so the subject has been top of mind for me lately. And since more than a few folks seem to be wrestling with this lately, this seems like a good opportunity to dig into it.
If we leave your attitude aside for the moment, it’s pretty simple: you’re chasing after these supposedly unavailable women because they’re unavailable. It’s quite literally a matter of your chasing after them because they’re running from you; if they were “attainable”, you wouldn’t be fighting as hard for them. If anything, you’d probably not find them nearly as attractive.
In general, people have a tendency to want things that we can’t have. The harder it is to get, the more frantic people become in their pursuit. We’ve seen this play out over and over again with consumer products – the tumblers, cameras, accessories, makeup or fashions that get popular on TikTok, limited edition toys or shoes or gew-gaws that sell out in seconds and then go for insane markups on eBay or resale sites. If it were common and easy to get ahold of, it wouldn’t have nearly the same allure as something that seems to be just out of reach.
The elevated and often exaggerated value of these things isn’t intrinsic, as much as it is in how much other people want them. The products themselves may be quite good – those always-on-backorder Fujifilm cameras are pretty damn tight – but it’s the fact that everyone wants them but nobody can get them that makes them extra special. They’re both status symbols – “look at my ability to get this exclusive thing” – and markers of being, if not in the “in crowd”, at least an attempt at being in the know and a la mode.
So it is with women. A lot of guys get hung up on chasing after particular women, not because they like them specifically, but because they think that having those women would be a status boost. The harder it is to “get” them, the more special they must be; the “challenge” of it all means that the relationship is more about “look at what this says about me!” rather than “this person is special of who she is.”
Needless to say, this is the definition of objectifying; the woman in question is less a wonderful and special person and more of a symbol of the man’s supposed higher value and status… not all that different from a sweet pair of limited-edition Nikes or an exclusive Hublot watch.
The other part of this equation involves attachment styles and emotional issues. A lot of people get into cycles of pursuing emotionally unavailable partners because it feels “right” to them. Often, it’s a matter of having an insecure or avoidant attachment style – they grew up having to fight and beg for attention from parents and family who often didn’t have time for them. This leaves them feeling like love is something they have to chase or earn, instead of something that’s given.
Another aspect is what’s known as intermittent reinforcement – where rewards (in this case, attention, love and affection) are doled out not just occasionally, but often seemingly randomly. You receive just enough of a reward to keep you engaged, but never on a consistent basis and certainly never at a level that’s commensurate with the effort to receive it. It’s the way slot machines in casinos or gacha games or loot boxes hook players; it’s the hope that maybe this next pull of the lever or cashing in the in-game currency (paid for with real money) will pay off the way you want.
Intermittent reinforcement has long been a part of the dating scene. The authors of The Rules infamously suggested that playing “hard to get”, even with people you were actively dating, was the “only” way to get and keep a man. Toxic and abusive people use it to manipulate and control their partners. But sometimes it’s a self-inflicted injury; like Pepe Le Pew they don’t realize that their sweet little cherie isn’t playing hard to get, they just don’t like them.
Guess which of these you’re doing. The issue here isn’t that these women are playing games or making you dance for their amusement because they like playing with their orbiters like a cat playing with mice; they’re not into you and you’re not getting the message. Instead, you’re romanticizing their distance and lack of attention as making them more beguiling and letting the smallest crumb of attention be all the encouragement you need to keep following them like a puppy.
You need to take a long, hard look at who you’re pursuing and how they’re behaving and ask yourself: why aren’t you taking “not interested” for an answer? Why is it the people you’re most consistently attracted to are the ones who show the least amount of reciprocal interest? Why are you not willing to accept that this behavior is, in fact, a signal that they don’t like you and don’t want to go on a date with you?
(Here’s a hint: it’s called ‘the sunk-cost fallacy’; you’re unwilling to admit that your investment is never going to pay off, so you keep throwing time and energy at it out of the fear that you’ll walk away right before you would’ve hit the jackpot.)
Incidentally, this is also part of why those women you’re not interested in are so seemingly dogged in their pursuit of you. Leaving aside the ones who are just trying to be friends, not drag you to the altar, you’re doing to them what those other women are supposedly doing to you.
This is a good time to ask why you’re not giving those women a more definite wave-off, then flip it around and apply the same thinking to the women who never seem to have time for you. Don’t want to be rude? Feel like you have to maintain a baseline in order to keep things harmonious at work? Worried that you’re going to reject them only to be told they weren’t trying to date you and now you look foolish? Cool… all those possibilities also apply to the women who are taking six days to reply to your texts and ghosting you when you’ve badgered them into dates they don’t want to go on.
At the risk of sounding like a hackey joke about psychology, now would be a very good time to go talk to a therapist about your relationship with your mother. If you’re this consistent in pursuing people who are just uninterested in you and are turned off or made uncomfortable by people who are interested and available, the odds that this is an emotional wound going all the way back to childhood are… well, a lot higher than the odds that this slot machine will eventually pay off.
Go work on healing those wounds (and your attitude) and you’ll see things change.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com