DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I know you’ve covered this topic before, and I apologize for bringing it up again. However, I have a question that I’m quite curious about. I am a man in my mid-20s who is still a virgin, and lacks dating experience. I’m not looking to ask whether a guy should tell his partner about his virginity or if women care about it (though I am somewhat curious about that). My question is this: for men who find themselves in this situation not by choice, what advice would you offer to steer them away from the pick-up artist approach?
Advertisement
I understand that pick-up artistry focuses heavily on practicality with little regard for genuine connection, and it often seems like a way to satisfy one’s own needs without truly bonding with a partner. How can these men be encouraged to move away from this mindset and toward a healthier way of losing their virginity, avoiding feelings of shame in the process? Thank you in advance for your response.
Unicorn Bait
DEAR UNICORN BAIT: Here’s the thing: the issue isn’t pick-up artistry per se. Pick-up and PUAs are a symptom, not a cause. The issue is the belief that being a virgin is inherently shameful and that a person’s worth is measured by the amount of sex they have or haven’t had.
If the issue truly was about whether someone has had a sexual experience or not, then it would be easily remedied. It’s a money-soluble problem – sex workers exist after all. There’re many who offer what’s known as a “girlfriend experience” – that is, providing an experience that feels more like an organic connection instead of a purely transactional exchange of money for services – and many who are perfectly happy to provide a virgin with their first experience. And honestly, for many people, that would likely be a better and more enjoyable first time than they might have had otherwise; they would be with someone who is sensitive to their needs and desires, whose focus will be on their pleasure and can help address or alleviate any of the little anxieties, mishaps or performance problems that might arise. They wouldn’t have to worry about their endurance, not being “good” their first time out or any of the other little bites from the anxiety weasels. Compare that to, say, a fumbling hook-up with a stranger you met at a bar or a date from a dating app and you can see how even the thrill of having had sex gets subsumed by the noise from their jerkbrains.
But that’s not the issue with losing one’s virginity. The issue is that what they want is to feel like they were chosen, that women have found them “worthy” enough to have sex with. This is why hiring a sex worker is seen as “cheating” or the mark of being a loser; they haven’t been chosen, they “have” to pay to get someone in bed.
Now personally speaking, I’m agnostic about how someone “should” lose their virginity. I don’t think you need to be “in love”, nor does it need to be with “someone special”. Losing your virginity doesn’t need to be a big production or special event. My only rule for how someone should have their first time is that the experience should be worth it. So, ideally, you would want your first time having sex to be with someone who is going to be a good and caring lover, who’s attentive and patient. That may be with a paid professional, it may be with a friend or acquaintance, it may be with a relative stranger. It could be a big production, or it could be the unexpected (but welcome) end to a date. It could even be a “Here, let’s get this over with/out of the way” if everyone’s cool with it.
But this approach is uncertain. Obviously, this requires the consent and participation of another person, and that is by no means assured. The appeal of PUA is that it promises men that if you follow these rules, you’re all but guaranteed success, that you will somehow convince a woman that you’re “worthy” and thus get in her pants. And therein lies the issue: it’s almost never about building a real and genuine connection; it’s about getting what you want in the way you want it. If we accept the idea that women only have sex with someone who’s “worthy” (we don’t, but we can pretend for the sake of this letter), then PUA is about how to fake being “worthy” or convince women that you are, even (or especially) if you’re not.
But as I keep saying, over and over again: women aren’t Mjolnir. People who decide to have sex with you aren’t gauging your worth as a person. Nobody has “anyone who parts these thighs, if they be worthy, shall have the power of SCORE” tattooed on their pubic mound.
(If only because that’s a lot of words to cram into a relatively constrained space.)
This is why the real problem �– say it with me now – was toxic masculinity all along. As long as guys hold themselves to the idea that sex is a measure of their worth as a person and the corresponding belief that women are the “gatekeepers” of sex, there will be shame around the issue of virginity. There will be pressure to focus on the short term goal of “get laid as quickly as possible” rather than trying to find and connect with someone who would be a good lover, or, for that matter, developing the skills to connect with that person.
PUA is, at best, a short cut to that personal development. Obviously, I’m all in favor of teaching people how to date, how to flirt, how to meet and connect with folks and how to find the sort of sex you want – whether in a committed relationship or lots of casual connections or any point in between. But PUA is about skipping ahead to the end. The success people find tends to be despite what they’ve been taught, not because of it, and most of what they learn are tricks, not real personal growth and what success they find tends to be fleeting at best. Trust me, I speak from personal experience; I learned a lot from my days as a PUA, but I had to unlearn nearly as much and untangle the toxic bulls--t from what was actually helpful.
This is why there’s not an easy or simple fix; it’s a societal issue. Without detangling sex and sexual experience from one’s sense of worth, the sense of shame and inadequacy will be there. Teaching boys that their value is distinct from who they’ve f--ked is a key part. So too are treating social skills like skills, abilities that are taught and learned, rather than a binary that you either have or you don’t.
(And then we get into the incredibly sex-negative and queerphobic cultural issues, but that’s another rant entirely…)
In the short term, encouraging them to focus on both their sense of self-worth (independent of sexual experience) and their social skills and calibration is key. This way, when they do find someone to sleep with, the experience will be a good one for its own sake… not because of what it “means” about them.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com