DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: My boyfriend & I have been partners for 3 years. We spend every weekend together.

He does not want to get married. I really want to marry him. We are both divorced.

We have had really beautiful discussions & agree to be faithful partners.

I still wish to be married & be his wife.

I’m hesitant to bring it up, again he was very thoughtful & kind when we discussed it a year ago.

Perhaps I’m eager to manage my feelings about this. I am thankful that we are committed partners. I did NOT discuss this previously as a “deal breaker.”

It is NOT!

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Say Yes Or Is It A Mess?

DEAR SAY YES OR IS IT A MESS: I have a couple thoughts, SYIIAM, but I really wish you said more about the discussion you had the last time you talked things through. It’s great that he was kind and thoughtful when you two discussed it, but that doesn’t give me a lot to work with in terms of what’s going on. And honestly, the answer to your dilemma is ultimately going to come down to just how important being married is to you, how important notmarrying is to your boyfriend, and why both of you feel this way.

On your side of things: what about being married would be different than what you have right now? Is it what the label of “wife” would mean rather than “partner” or “girlfriend”? Would having an official imprimatur on the relationship make such a difference to you and your connection with your partner? Would it be about the legal rights and privileges that marriage gives?

Or perhaps it’s what being “married” might mean, practically – living together rather than living separately and spending the weekends together? The possibility of having children and more intwined lives? A greater feeling of permanence or intentionality to the relationship?

On your boyfriend’s side of things: what are his reasons for not wanting to get married again? Was his divorce particularly acrimonious or dramatic? Did his ex-wife break his heart to pieces and he doesn’t feel like he could go through that again? Is he worried that wrapping himself into another person – legally, financially, spiritually – would create complications and pain if the relationship came to an end?

Or is it that maybe being married taught him that a “traditional” relationship path wasn’t for him? Is it possible or likely that he likes having a greater degree of independence and autonomy than he might expect if you two were married? Maybe he prefers feeling like he has his life during the week and seeing you on weekends and thus getting the best of both independence and cohabitation at the same time?

It’s also worth asking whether this is a permanent state of affairs or if there’s the possibility of one or either of you changing your mind over time. Is it possible, for example, that while he didn’t want to get married when you talked about it a year ago, but his views have changed in the interim?

Alternately, would there be compromises that you could be happy with that weren’t marriage, per se? Would a commitment ceremony of some sort – not a legal binding but one that signified your commitment and fidelity to one another – work? Or perhaps, if not moving in together, living arrangements that didn’t feel so separated? Would you and he be cool with having side-by-side apartments or living in both halves of a duplex, so you could have your own separate lives but also be together more often?   

One thing that might be helpful – for all couples really, not just you and your beau –  would be to have a periodic check-ins with one another. I understand being worried about bringing it up again after the last time you talked marriage – nobody likes feeling like a nag or like they’re trying to pressure someone into something they don’t want. But a year can be a long time and a lot can happen in that time. A check-in wouldn’t need to be anything dramatic, just taking time out to sit down and make sure that you’re both on the same page, that you both feel like your relationship is meeting your needs and what could be done if it isn’t.

Part of it would be to make sure that you know how he’s currently feeling about marriage (in general and to you), and that he knows how you feel (you want to be married to him but it’s not something you’re willing to make a hard line in the relationship over). Part of it might be to discuss what things you both could do that might satisfy the both of you. It might even help to have a relationship counselor who could facilitate the discussion. The point wouldn’t be to persuade one of you to the other’s way of thinking, but to have a third party who could help give you both the tools to build the sort of relationship that could make you both happy. After all, it could well be that the underlying issue isn’t marriage but societal expectations of what a “serious” relationship is or looks like.

And speaking of counselors: you mention that part of your writing in might be because you want help managing your feelings about this. That, I think, is a sign that you might want to talk to a counselor or therapist on your own. I don’t think you need to stop feeling the way you feel, but talking it through with a trained and uninvolved third party might help you understand those feelings a bit better. Working with a counselor might help you decide if marriage is going to be a deal breaker eventually, if they’re a sign of an unmet need or if there’s something else going on under the hood. It may even be reassuring to have someone tell you that yeah, it’s totally fine to have those feelings.

But at the end of the day, it all ultimately comes down to you and your boyfriend. Talking things through and making sure you understand each other’s positions is a good thing. So is making sure you’re both happy and appreciate what you have and one another.

Good luck.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com

DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I noticed something that may or may not be holding me back in terms of dating. That I’m, well, frankly perhaps too selective, too picky and get easily turned off by well a lot.

For example I don’t like smokers; I can’t take the smell, the breath is awful is and well frankly they’re slowly killing themselves with cancer sticks and I don’t wanna be part of that ride. I don’t wanna date a virgin (compared to another guys who want a virgin) because being a virgin in your 20s is a walking pile of red flags cause well if nobody wants to sleep with you this late in life that must speak volumes of your character. I don’t wanna date fat people because I don’t find them sexually appealing or attractive nor can I picture having sex with one and sex is very important to me. I don’t wanna want to date a Christian or anyone religious because that sounds like an incredibly dull, restrictive life style and there is a non-chance they’re probably racist or homophobic which GTFO with that. I don’t wanna date with autism (despite being one) or any mental problems I’m not a therapist or a punching bag (both metaphorical or very literally) I’ve got my own s--t to deal with and I don’t want to be dumped with more.

I know people say be open minded and people change my mind but don’t open your mind so wide that your brain falls out. So what do I do then? How do I stop writing off people so easily based on one characteristic? Or dismissing them based on immutable or very mutable characteristics? Am I being too shallow? How do I overcome this? Should I forced to date people that I’m not attracted too?

Sincerely, 

Don’t Gamble with Maybes

DEAR DON’T GAMBLE WITH MAYBES: Right off the bat, DGWM: you can you can set your standards wherever you choose and be as restrictive or permissive as you want. If you decide that the only people you would want to date are PhD candidates who sing Italian opera and paint Warhammer minis semi-professionally, then that’s your lookout. Similarly, you can have as many dealbreakers as you choose to. If someone parting their hair on the left instead of the right is something you can’t stand, then you do you my guy.

But there’s a corollary to that: the longer your list of dealbreakers and the higher and more exclusive your standards, the shallower and smaller your dating pool will be. The more reasons you have to not date someone, the longer you’ll be single. That’s the inevitable trade-off, and you have to decide for yourself if that’s worth it for you. For some people, it absolutely is. But it also makes it much harder for people to be sympathetic if and when those people complain about how long they’ve gone without a date or how hard it is to find a partner. They set that difficulty level themselves; they’re free to lower it to something easier if they prefer. Nobody is telling them to date people they’re not attracted to; they’re just saying “you did this to yourself.”

Now, it’s tempting to just leave things there and move onto the next letter. But I think one thing that is important for everyone is to occasionally take stock of ones must-haves and ones dealbreakers and examine them and ask yourself “why do I feel this way?” It’s important because sometimes what we assume are our standards or our dealbreakers aren’t necessarily accurate. That is: there’s what we think we want and what we think we don’t want and then there’re things that we actually do want or can’t work with. Sometimes they’re the same thing. Sometimes, they absolutely aren’t. And sometimes they say more about us than they do about the people we do or don’t want to date.

Take appearance and looks, for example. Nobody would say that they like dating people who they find unattractive. But it’s good to ask why is a particular look or set of features important to you or important for them to not have. A lot of the reason, for example, why East and South Asian men struggle with dating isn’t because they’re inherently unattractive but because of a literal centuries-long campaign of proclaiming them to be sexually null. From the days of when Chinese labor helped build the railroads to today, Asian men have been othered; when they weren’t portrayed as being filthy and diseased degenerates, they were being portrayed as asexual and effeminate – as opposite of “traditional” masculinity as one could find. Black women, likewise, struggle with dating in part because of cultural hegemonic values that continually elevate northern European features in women while denigrating features more likely to be found in indigenous people – flatter faces, broader noses, thicker cheekbones, darker skin tones and so on.

The same goes with fatness. A lot of men actually are attracted to fat women… but they don’t want to be seen as someone who “has” to date fat women. Because of how fatness is treated, how we equate body composition with personality types, with moral judgement and attractiveness, being fat is treated as a social failing… but being with a fat person is seen as being even worse. It’s taken as “proof” that the person who’s with them has “settled” or is somehow “reduced” to being with them, even if the reality is that this person has actively chosen a fat partner and is thrilled by his or her body.

This is especially true among men, where much of our supposed value and status as men is equated with the “quality” (read: conventional attractiveness) of the people we sleep with. The social shaming of a man who dates a fat woman is part of enforcing that cultural hegemony and reinforcing the standards that men are “supposed” to derive their status from. Someone who willingly bucks those trends and doesn’t allow the opprobrium to force them back in line threatens that social order.

So it’s always worth examining your preferences and trying to determine where they came from and how many of them are actually what you want or what you’ve been told you should want.

And this is important because it applies to your dealbreakers as well: how many of those are because of experience and self-knowledge and how many of those are based around either received information or even just supposition and ignorance.

Case in point: you wouldn’t want to date a virgin because an older virgin is a walking pile of red flags. Ok… says who? What makes you certain that an older virgin is a virgin because he or she has something wrong with them? Why wouldn’t it be a sign of, say, someone who has high standards and only wants to have sex with someone they love? Or who didn’t want to f--k just anyone, but the only single people around were folks who demonstrated through their actions that not f--king them was the right choice?

Why couldn’t it be a sign of someone who, until recently, didn’t make dating or relationships a priority? Or who may not have had many opportunities to date for reasons that are outside of their control? Would you assume that a gay man who’s a virgin at 20 to be a “walking pile of red flags” when they were the only out gay person in their very conservative town? Or who lived in a place where being openly queer meant running the risk of being beaten, jailed or even killed? Why would that be a mark against them, rather than just a series of unfortunate circumstances that made having sex a nigh-impossibility?  

Similarly, not wanting to date a Christian. As much as I have my issues with organized religion in general, being religious doesn’t automatically mean that someone is a bigot or a homophobe. Yeah, there are a lot of bigoted people out there who are Christian. There’re lots of people who are bigots who aren’t Christian too – not just followers of other religions but atheists and agnostics as well. Similarly, being Christian (or Jewish or Hindu or Muslim or Sikh or pagan or…) doesn’t automatically mean they’re racist or homophobic; there’re many, many churches and denominations that aren’t just accepting of queer people but welcoming and supportive. There’re churches and denominations that are actively anti-racist and for whom civil rights and social justice are a core component of how they’re called to love and to serve.

The same goes with their beliefs and restrictions. Not every branch of Christianity insists that dancing is a sin and having fun is how the Devil gets you, any more than all Jews are like the ultra-Orthodox who believe in the strict separation of the sexes, or how all Muslims or Hindus are like their most extreme examples. Hell, even within groups that do theoretically have firm beliefs and restrictions, that doesn’t mean that people obey them. Catholicism specifically forbids any form of contraception that isn’t “natural family planning” (aka the rhythm method). Despite this, 99% of Catholics report using non-permitted forms of contraception including IUDs, condoms, hormonal birth control or sterilization.

Then there’s the question of whether you’re rejecting people for the same things you would hope that they would show you grace on. You say you’re autistic and yet you wouldn’t want to date another autistic person. But why would the reasons you list for not wanting to date someone who’s autistic not also apply to you? Would other people be right to exclude you from their dating pool because you’re autistic and would you cheer their right to do so? Or would you be hurt that they couldn’t see you as a person, rather than a label or a stereotype – especially stereotypes that are frequently inaccurate or outright malicious?

Are you treating potential partners as therapists or punching bags? Are you capable of not making someone you date responsible for your mental health or “dumping your problems” on them? If you’re fully capable of handling your own issues or managing them in ways that are appropriate, why wouldn’t other people in circumstances similar to yours be just as capable?

Now to be sure: none of this means that you are wrong for having standards or that your standards are bad and you should feel bad. Nor does it mean that the point of examining your standards or deal breakers is to come around to being open to all and sundry. It’s simply to be more mindful and self-aware of what you’re doing and why. It could well be that yes, you’re just attracted to a particular body type or have a preference to some and not others. You could come to recognize that you’ve had enough negative experiences with people with strong religious beliefs that you can’t fully relax or open up in ways that you would need to in order to make a relationship work.

But you could also come to realize that some of what you see as a dealbreaker is born out of ignorance or prejudice. You might recognize that things you find unattractive or undesirable in others are a reflection of how you feel about yourself. Or you might realize that some of what you think you want is more about what other people think or would judge you for, rather than something than being a true desire or true dealbreaker.

You might even realize that things that were important to you at one stage of your life aren’t as important to you now. You may find that your tastes have changed or that experience has taught you differently and what you think is important is actually far less of a priority than it was before.

Or maybe you’ll come to the conclusion that nope, this is how it is, this is how your heart and your junk work and you’re still comfortable with keeping your standards where they are.

The only person who can decide any of this is you. Which means that the consequences of those decisions – both positive and negative – are solely up to you as well. The more you understand yourself and your choices, the better and more informed decision you can make.

Good luck.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com

DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I’m a 20 year old female and he’s 21. He’s an international student and been in the states for 3 years now. We are both in college. (Different race but we do have the same religion). 

It’s been more than a year since we started talking. We were in the talking stage at first he cooked for me and gave me flowers on our first date and we had sex. It was unexpected cause we weren’t planning to do it but it’s just happened. We talked for 2 weeks and then he ended up ghosting me. Also he does get depressed often cause he misses his family and only have few friends here and not really mature. 

After ghosting me for 3 weeks he apologized sent me a huge essay and tried to make it up to me. I didn’t really care. I’m not a sensitive person and I try to stay unbothered. So when he asked for a second chance I was like “okay” and it turned it into a FWB and he made it clear he is not in a place to date anyone. 

I’m guessing he just doesn’t wanna date (me). 

We would ghost each other for no reason sometimes we would get into fights and stop talking but he would come back every time. 

Also we are really good friends too if we are not having sex. We would still talk about our families, friends and about our life for hours. We have a few great memories together and we would both talk about it sometimes. He was talking to this one girl 5 months ago he told me about it and we stopped talking too cause he does stay loyal when he’s talking to someone. They didn’t even last a month and we started having sex again. 

But why did he try to date other girls when he is not ready for a relationship? I didn’t ask him any questions about it cause I know if me and him get into a relationship it won’t work out for a lot of reasons but I do like him a lot but that doesn’t mean I think of him 24/7 or trying to have something serious. I also got into a relationship last year and it only lasted 2 months I ghosted him too when I was with my ex. But we are both single now and two days ago we were talking on the phone and he started saying stuff like “I still remember our first date it was like a movie. I would like to do it again. I will give you flowers again too” which made me wonder: does he still like me? I know he used to like me a lot when we first started talking but it’s been more than a year now. If he doesn’t wanna date (me) specifically, why didn’t he ever give me a reason? I never really asked though. Also he does tell me things like “I do think about you”. Sex is great and we both crave each other a lot. I think my attachment to him is more of a sexual nature. 

I don’t really have romantic thoughts about him but I know if he ever asks me to give us a try. I might. 

So what are we?

Friends With Benefits Package

DEAR FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS PACKAGE: Far be it from me to question how people define their relationships (actually that’s a lie, I do that professionally) but I’m going to be honest: saying “we’re good friends if we’re not having sex” made me cock a skeptical eyebrow. That seems to conflict with the way the two of you behave – both when you’re having sex and when you’re not.

To be sure, I don’t think every friendship needs to be a constant connection, and there’re many friendships that work well even with long periods of radio silence before picking up where things left off like no time had passed. But the way the two of you seem to ghost each other at the drop of a hat is concerning at the very least. It seems difficult at best to build the sort of connection and trust that’s a core of a strong friendship when the other person seems to drop off the face of the planet at random intervals, followed by elaborate apologies. At best that strikes me as being dysfunctional and more than a little exhausting.

This is a case where the two of you are both young and inexperienced and sort of fumbling forward with good intentions, if not with good grace. I don’t, for example, think that your sometime FWB is trying to keep you on the hook or backburner you so that he always has something to come back to. I think he’s being honest in saying he’s not really in a place to date – and I agree with him. ��The problem is that while he’s right about not being ready to date, I think it’s for the wrong reasons.

I realize that sounds a bit absurd – who cares what the reasons are if the outcome is the same? It matters because of how it affects his behavior, and how his behavior affects others.

Case in point: his relationship with you. For someone who theoretically doesn’t want to be in a committed relationship, he comes on very strong and conveys an entirelydifferent message. His first date with you – flowers, cooking dinner, etc. – is the sort of thing I would not only expect on maybe a third date but also from someone who’s looking for something more committed. As I’ve said many times before: being in a casual relationship doesn’t mean that you can treat your partner casually, but that’s the sort of date that gives a strong impression of wanting romance and long-term commitment.

The same applies to his flowery apologies and declarations of how he can remember your date and wants to do it all again but moreso. Those are the sorts of things I would expect to hear from someone who is looking for a serious girlfriend, not an FWB. This conflict between what he says and what he does is almost custom made to create a lot of confusion and frustration.

It’s also really not fair for the people on the receiving end of these mixed signals. This sort of behavior – especially for someone who may not have a lot of experience themselves – can end up creating situations that ultimately waste people’s time. This is especially true for an on-again/off-again relationship like yours; it leaves one or both people on the hook as the other vanishes only to come back later and restart the whole messy saga – making it that much harder for either partner to find a relationship that might better meet their needs.  

And here’s the especially frustrating thing: I don’t think the issue is that he doesn’t want to date you, per se. From the way the two of you keep ending up back in bed together, I feel safe in saying that the two of you clearly have an emotional connection and no small amount of physical chemistry, considering how frequently the two of you end up falling back in bed after weeks or months of not talking. If I were to guess, I think the issue is more banal. I’d wager cash money that the real issue is down to his being in his early twenties, at college in a new country. I suspect that he worries that maybe things moved too fast or he’s afraid that if he starts to see you exclusively he’ll end up feeling like he’s missing out on other opportunities… even if it means giving up what might otherwise be a good thing. It’s FOMO to an absurd degree: giving up what he has that he clearly likes for the vague possibility that something more is out there.

And therein lies the problem. I think the real reason he’s not boyfriend material right now is that he doesn’t know what he wants, he’s afraid of making a “mistake” and he doesn’t know how to communicate this. So instead of being able to be up front about it, having the wherewithal to stop keeping you on the hook or talking things through so that you and he could figure out if it’s worth trying to make this work he just… bounces. And then comes back. And bounces again.  

And  if I’m being honest, it doesn’t seem like you’re handling it much better than he is. You’re not exactly covering yourself in glory here either. You say that you’re pretty sure you wouldn’t want to date him if it were an option… but you’re still doing this dance with him. You seem as prone as he to just dropping off the face of the planet as he, and just as unwilling to either put the brakes on this or to call the question. So instead you find yourselves in this position of bouncing off each other constantly, rebounding towards one another and then bouncing away again.

If that was something that you both discussed and both agreed you were ok with it, that would be one thing. But right now it seems to me like neither of you are willing to so much as call the question, never mind actually commit to something. So instead, you’re in this quasi-relationship that’s neither fish nor fowl and doesn’t seem to actually satisfy either of you. I keep wondering if the sex is enough to make up for the rest of the frustration and the way it keeps either of you from ever moving on.

This is why emotional intelligence and self-awareness are important parts of dating successfully. Part of it is recognizing a bad or problematic situation, even if aspects of it are acceptable or even enjoyable. Right now, it doesn’t seem like either of you are doing a great job of communicating or advocating for your own needs, nor at balancing having a friendship with one person with having a romantic or sexual relationship with another. None of that bodes well for anything long term– either with each other or with other people.

One or both of you need to s--t or get off the pot. While I’m a firm believer that friendship and sex aren’t mutually exclusive, that requires more maturity and stronger communication than either of you are exhibiting right now. That’s something that can be improved over time… but it’s progress that neither of you can really make until you both can actually break this cycle and make it stick.

My advice would be to drop the sexual side of things and commit to being friends until you both get better at both knowing what you want and being able to communicate those needs. Yes, this runs the risk of one or both of you ending up with someone else… but right now it certainly doesn’t seem like you’re in a place where you’d be right for each other. In the future you may well be, and you may get there in time. But for now? I think the two of you are hindering each other’s growth more than helping.

Good luck.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com