DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I’ve got a conflict that’s not really about dating, but I could really use some advice on how to navigate this tricky situation.��So here’s the deal: my close friends, let’s call them Sam and Alex, were in a serious relationship for a few years. But things went south when it came to light that Alex cheated on Sam. It was a big mess, emotions were all over the place, and ultimately, they decided to break up. I don’t know the details that lead up to it, the third party isn’t in our friend group, I don’t know who’s “at fault” if anyone; I just know what I told you.
I say that because the problem is that this is causing all kinds of tension in our overall friend group. Everyone’s been feeling the pressure to take sides and decide who they can be friends with and who they can’t. Speaking just for myself, I’ve been friends with both of them for a long time, and I’m not sure how to handle things post-breakup. I can see why Sam is hurt and betrayed, and I can also understand that people make mistakes and maybe Alex is genuinely sorry. It’s a tough spot to be in, and I don’t want to take sides or choose one over the other.
On one hand, I feel like I should be there for Sam, supporting them through this tough time because they’re really hurting. But on the other hand, I don’t want to abandon Alex either, especially if they genuinely regret their actions and are trying to make amends.
I’ve considered trying to remain neutral and stay friends with both of them, but I’m worried that might not be practical or even possible. There’s a lot of tension between them, and hanging out together as a group seems awkward and uncomfortable now. And I’m going to be real, there’s a LOT of talk in the group chat about who is or isn’t siding with who and I feel like I’m going to be the asshole if I side with Alex or if I stay neutral.
I don’t want to be seen as betraying Sam’s trust by being friends with Alex, but I also don’t want to turn my back on a friend who might need support and a chance to grow from their mistakes.
What should I do, Doc? Is it possible to remain friends with both of them, or do I have to pick a side? I feel like I’m stuck between a rock and a hard place here. Any advice on how to handle this situation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Tired of Playing Referee
DEAR TIRED OF PLAYING REFEREE: Alright, I’m going to preface this by saying that I don’t think cheating is necessarily the worst thing that someone can do in a relationship, nor do I think that all cheating is equal. Other people obviously disagree, but my general philosophy on infidelity is going to color my advice on all of this.
This is a tricky knot to untangle, TPR. It’s not unusual for break ups to test the bounds of social circles in the aftermath. There are a lot of times when one person or the other “gets the friends” in the break up. These sorts of fissures tend to fall in fairly predictable lines; most of the time, the split occurs either along longevity (So-and-so was part of the group first), closeness (you’re tighter with one than the other) or fault (Such-and-such was a cheating piece of s--t).
But it’s also not unusual for folks to say “I’m not taking sides” or “I’m not choosing”. Though, to quote the sages, even choosing not to choose, you still have made a choice. Often, it’s more about trying to avoid confrontations or having to take responsibility for having to make a choice and letting others decide it for you. But there are times when it’s honestly about being close to both people and not wanting to have to end a relationship with one or the other.
Now, often there are times when the choice is fairly simple, clean cut or obvious. Sometimes one party is very firmly in the wrong and did something that would, understandably be a friendship-terminating event.
Other times though? Well… other times, what is one person’s FTE is another person’s grey area. And cheating, absent relevant information or context can be one of those. It’s also one where the politics of a social circle can become far more prevalent and way the f--k messier.
Here are my thoughts:
First and foremost, as a general rule, I tend to side-eye people who make demands about choosing sides in situations like this. Absent other information (Alex is a serial cheater! Sam has been an abusive partner!) or acts that go beyond the pale (Alex hit Sam, Sam sold Alex’s dog while Alex was out of town), a lot comes down to why you’re being told to choose. And it’s rare that it’s about right or wrong, but about human nature, and humans are messy bitches that live for the drama as a general rule. After all, it’s very easy for people not directly involved to say “how dare you not do X”; binary definitions of good and bad are easy to come by when it’s not your ox being gored. Demanding that others shun the wrong-doer can frequently be more about enforcing conformity or establishing oneself as the arbiter of morality than it is about actually addressing the issue. This is especially true of folks who insist that sides must be taken and there can be no middle ground.
Now, you don’t say if anyone’s actually making demands yet. It sounds like right now it’s mostly a lot of talk back and forth. Were I you, I’d suggest maybe bowing out of the chat for now and making a boundary of not talking about it until you’ve decided. If folks do start making solid demands of “you must side with X to stay in this friends group”… honestly, I’d be questioning how much I’d want to stick around people who make demands like that. Again, depending on circumstances of the actual offence.
But if they’re not? I’d say that you should either mute that particular discussion or turn off notifications for the group chat for a bit until things die down, so you can decide for yourself, without feeling like your choice was pressured one way or the other.
My next thought is, how much of your hesitancy is about being close to both and how much is about not wanting to risk confrontation with either Sam or Alex? This is an important one to consider. Is it possible that you’ve actually made your decision, but you’re worried about having to actually take responsibility for it if either Sam or Alex ask?
(As callous as it may sound, this is where flipping a coin may be helpful to sort out how you feel. Assign heads to Sam and tails to Alex and flip it. It doesn’t matter which actually comes up; as soon as the coin is in the air, you’ll know which you’re hoping to see. And that may well give you the answer in terms of whether this is legitimate indecision or not.)
The next thought after that: talk to them both. Talk to Sam and commiserate and be sympathetic. Talk to Alex and say “what the f--k, dude?” and hear what he has to say. Maybe you’re correct and this was a moment where he failed his wisdom save and there but for the grace of God go the rest of us. You may well be correct that he feels awful about it and wants to do better.
How does he talk about it? Does he dodge responsibility or accept it? Is he making excuses as to why this wasn’t so bad, or does he demonstrate that he knows what he did wrong and owns his choices? Does he know why he did it and can he explain how he ended up there? For that matter, does he play the “woe is me” card by being so remorseful that you almost feel like you’re being obligated to forgive him?
Just as importantly, since you know both people: are they both equally trustworthy? Are either of them prone to drama, tend to make themselves out to be the hero/victim regardless of circumstance? If Sam tells you one story and Alex tells you a different one, can you say with some degree of certainty that it’s a Rashomon situation where everyone is giving an honest retelling of the event as they saw it? Or is one of them likely to be telling you the version they think you want to hear? Or the one that puts them in the best light?
And, as cold-blooded as this may sound: if the group splits… are you going to be ok staying neutral or choosing one person or the other if that means the possibility of losing friends in the process? I don’t ask because there’s a “correct” answer here, I ask because it’s important to understand where your head is at with this and how the consequences of your choices may shake out. Just as with flipping the coin, you may well come to realize that you’ve already decided, but you worry your choice will come with costs that you are hesitant to pay.
Now, I can’t tell you which way to lean on this – towards Alex, towards Sam, towards not choosing. I’m not there, they’re not my friends and so on. Not choosing and trying to stay close to both is an option.
However, one thing to keep in mind is that, however you choose, you may still not see results you’d prefer. You could decide to stay close to both, but find that some of the people in your social circle fall away – either because you chose “wrong”, or simply because the fractures of this relationship revealed faut lines within the social circle.
You may also choose one or the other and find that they still drift out of your life. Or that the person you didn’t choose comes back into it eventually.
As I said: it’s a messy situation, and one that can end up being more complicated because of the aftershocks more than the initial event. The best advice I can give you is to make sure you know your own mind and why you make the decision you ultimately land on. The more you at least understand yourself and your choices, the more comfortable you likely are to be with what you finally decide.
Yeah, there may well be after effects that you can’t possibly account for. That’s life, unfortunately. None of us can thread the needle so well that everything remains, if not the same, at least tolerably similar. The best we can do at any time is make the best choice we can with the information we have in that moment and do our best with whatever happens next.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com