DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: It’s been years since I’ve read your site but I found it extremely helpful back in my single days, which I’m hoping are not about to recur.
My fiancée “Isla” and I have been together for four years and engaged for almost a year. Our wedding date is set for July 2023. We’re both highly strange, sensitive, particular people who seemed to have found our perfect counterpart in each other. We have the same political opinions, food preferences, taste in media—we even share the same uncommon kink. We never went into great detail about our past relationships, which is how we both seemed to prefer it. Recently however Isla got on my computer and found the (non-pornographic) pictures I’ve kept of my previous girlfriends. She became upset because all three of them were natural redheads, as is she.
The truth is, I’ve always been extremely attracted to red-haired women, for reasons I honestly don’t know—and, being a socially awkward introvert, I’ve only been able to get up the courage to approach women I’m extremely attracted to. It just happens that all three who then agreed to go out with me were redheads. But when I tried to explain this, Isla accused me of having a fetish and not really loving her because I’m only attracted to her appearance, which is completely untrue—I initially asked her out because I was physically attracted to her, but would not have stayed with her for four years, let alone asked her to marry me, if I didn’t love her personality, spirit, and intellect even more.
We had the first serious, voice-raising, name-calling fight of our entire relationship, and I ended up leaving our shared apartment and staying with a male friend. But I’ve also been talking to a mutual female friend, who told me Isla has been acting unlike herself lately, although she doesn’t know why. She also told me that all four of Isla’s previous boyfriends have been very tall, even though Isla herself is barely 5’1”. When I finally got Isla on the phone, and brought this fact up, she said it wasn’t the same thing and have no excuse for what she still calls my “ginger fetish.”
The call ended on a bad note. I’m completely distraught. The only thing I can think of is that she’s having cold feet about marriage and is trying to force a breakup with me, and just seized upon the first reason she could find. Could this be true, or is there any merit to what she’s saying? Is there any hope that we can make it through this, possibly with counseling? If so, what can I say or do to convince her to try?
Sincerely,
Filthy Fetishist?
DEAR FILTHY FETISHIST: I see today’s a “let’s clarify things before we actually answer the question” day.
As I’ve said before, the general policy for Ask Dr. NerdLove is that I’m not terribly fussed about fake letters and people hoping to get one over on me by positing some fictional scenario. 9 times out of 10, the fake letters – especially ones hoping to launder someone’s position or belief through somebody’s column – are glaringly obvious and easily found out. The ones that do make it through, however, rarely bother me. The truth is that all letters to advice columns, legit or otherwise, are functionally fake or theoretical to everyone except the letter writer. And if there’s something that can be taught or good to be gleaned from a “fake” letter, then that’s all to the good.
Now with that in mind, let’s address this… dilemma. And we’ll start with a discussion about the difference between fetishes and attraction. Fetishes means “an object or bodily part whose real or fantasized presence is psychologically necessary for sexual gratification and that is an object of fixation to the extent that it may interfere with complete sexual expression” as per WebMD. In practice this can also refer to certain physical or sociological traits… such as weight, sexual or gender identity, disability, ethnicity or race. People with so-called “yellow fever”, for example, fetishize East Asian people for their ethnicity, while “devotees” fetishize people with disabilities. There’re people who fetishize fat women or trans women… the list is quite literally endless.
Now, there’re plenty of folks who will say that this is about attraction and preference, not fetishism, and there are people who are ok with being fetishized this way. For many, someone being attracted to you because of what makes you different or who you uniquely are instead of despite it can be incredibly validating.
But the problem is when the attraction isn’t to the person, but that feature or quality about them. The folks who fetishize East Asian women, for example, don’t simply have a deep and abiding love of Vietnamese or Malaysian or Indonesian culture and the people who live there. What they’re into is their idea of what East Asian women supposedly are: meek, submissive, eager to please and – critically – will exist to just serve their (primarily white) partner in all ways.
The same goes for people who fetishize fat women or disabled people or trans people; it’s not about the person, it’s about the thing that makes them different. The person is ultimately irrelevant, and in fact assertions of their individuality and agency tend to ruin the attraction. Doubly so if they stubbornly don’t live up to the stereotype in the fetishist’s head.
Now, is it possible to fetishize redheads? Sure, why not. “Ginger” stereotypes and prejudice don’t have the same hold here that one might find elsewhere, but they do exist, and I’m sure there’s someone who gets their motor revving over the idea of a redheaded spitfire. But odds are far greater that this is a preference, not a fetish.
Finding one particular aesthetic feature more attractive than another isn’t a fetish. To give an example: I know a lot of women who like guys with strong hands and forearms; it’s a body part that really turns them on. Line up a bunch of men of the same general attractiveness, and the dude with incredible hands will ultimately get their attention. It’s a feature that gives that person a little extra weight in their attractiveness, a value-add that will nudge them over the line before the others.
The same, incidentally, can be true about height. You can dress it up in evopsych drag, but more realistically, it’s about social values, exoticism and the attraction of the novel.
It may also be a quality that tends to show up as a sign of compatibility or signal other aspects of the person they find attractive. At one point while doing an inventory of my more longer relationships, I realized just how many women I dated were involved in renaissance faires – either as attendees or employees. That doesn’t mean I have a fetish for Rennies or women in corsets (…though now that you mention it… ), it means that the people I tend to be most compatible with and most attracted to tend to be the sort of people who also like ren faires. They also, not coincidentally, tend to like tabletop RPGs and similar pop culture and have similar personality types.
But the issue here isn’t how many gingers you’ve dated; it’s how your fiancée feels about you feel about her. The idea that you’ve dated too many redheads is less about “you’re a filthy fetishist who doesn’t see gingers as people”, and much more about “I worry that you’re not actually attracted to me as an individual and I’m ultimately interchangeable to you”. Which, if distilled further, really comes down to “there’s something that’s making me feel distanced and unloved and I don’t know how to express it”.
If your fiancé is so upset about this that she’s been acting “off” and the conflict has gotten bad enough that you moved out, then this would imply that there’s something bothering her that goes far beyond just “you dated too many gingers”… and likely beyond “you two have really poor communication and conflict resolution skills” to boot. And that’s something that only she can tell you.
My suggestion would be for the two of you to postpone the wedding, get back whatever deposits you can and then hie thyselves to a relationship counselor’s couch, pronto. If you and she have any hope of making this relationship work, then the looming deadline of a wedding needs to be taken off the table. Having a “must solve this issue by X date” hanging over your heads only serves to incentivize brushing the actual issues under the rug in hopes of making it to the church on time. Take that pressure away – just the wedding itself, not the engagement – and you give yourself more breathing room. You’ll have time to dig into the issues at a more reasonable pace, without the perverse incentives to pretend that it’s all been fixed. Plus, you can determine if you do want to get married, or if this is ultimately a sign that the relationship has come to its natural conclusion. It’s far easier to wind down a relationship that’s ended when you don’t need to get lawyers involved.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com