life

Don’t Be a Valentine’s Day Buzzkill

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | February 10th, 2008

DEAR MISS MANNERS: The prevailing custom in elementary school these days seems to be that a child must -- must -- bring a Valentine's Day card for each and every other student in her classroom (plus the teacher).

This seems to me to be a debasement of the whole purpose of a Valentine, which is to show how much you admire someone else. Granted, there are hurt feelings when a Valentine is not received as expected, especially if one was delivered, but is a valueless mass delivery any improvement on that?

I am considering boycotting the entire ceremony for my little girls (both in kindergarten this year) in the hopes of getting teachers and other parents to consider just what has become of this holiday. Any suggestions?

GENTLE READER: Chiefly this one: Do not, repeat not, cast your little girls in the role of Valentine's Day spoilers. You would soon be sympathizing with those who can't bear to see children being left out.

Adults make their own points themselves, and the proper place to make yours is at a parent-teacher meeting, where other voices can be heard. Miss Manners believes you might have a better chance if you suggest that the individual admiration cards be in addition to general ones. That way, the children who receive many can still run around asking the others how many they got.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am a 20-year-old college student who has been lucky enough to find a wonderful man. We will be married next summer, but my mother has already started on the guest list.

Because she and my father are graciously paying for the wedding, I don't mind that the majority of the list are friends of hers. I have objected to her wanting to invite some church friends that both my fiance and I have never even met and don't have much desire to meet, but she insists that it would be rude to leave them out.

All I can think about is how awkward the receiving line will be when my fiance and I will both be saying nice to meet you. I want a wedding that will be on a smaller, more intimate level so I don't think that I'm wrong in this. Would you please help us?

GENTLE READER: Not if it involves telling your mother that you have no desire to meet people she feels ought to be there.

Miss Manners suspects that you may have been over-exposed to the commercial wedding literature that declares that it is "your day" and "all about you," before it lures you into debt.

Many aspects of marriage are all about you two, but the wedding is a two-family event.

And don't worry about meeting new people in the receiving line. Unless you have already been introduced to every one of your bridegroom's cousins and his parents' friends, you will be meeting many people for the first time. Since they will all be telling you how beautiful you look, it should be a pleasant experience.

:

life

A Bruise Is Not Always Abuse

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | February 7th, 2008

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am going through an acrimonious divorce. My ex used a bruise on my daughter's hip to cause me and the children immense grief by reporting it to the authorities rather than simply calling or e-mailing for an explanation of the accident.

My two young daughters were pulled from their classes and were interviewed by the county specialist, with, in one case a teacher and, in the other case, the principal present. By the time I was interviewed, the specialist who had interviewed my daughters announced that clearly there was no abuse in this case and "this thing happens all the time in divorces."

Be that as it may, I feel terrible for my children and the school staff that had to go through this. I am at a loss as to how to deal with the teacher and principal.

Do I send a note apologizing for them having to interrupt their schedule and saying, "Sorry my ex is such a witch"? Although they heard my children say nice things about me in the interview, it would also be nice to let them know that I was exculpated, without sounding like a jerk. Any ideas?

GENTLE READER: In general, an apology should not attempt to blame someone else. In this case, Miss Manners certainly sees the temptation, but there are two more reasons to refrain from doing so.

First, a gentleman should never speak ill of his former wife. And second, you don't need to, because your having been exonerated makes her behavior quite clear. A note apologizing for the disruption of the school schedule could, however, mention that you were sorry that it was "unnecessarily" disrupted.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband and I hosted a Super Bowl party and were absolutely appalled by the number of guests who brought several of their own friends, without acknowledging these people in their RSVP. What should have been a party of 24 turned into 35, and it was difficult to accommodate everyone in our small townhouse.

Some of the "extra guests" did not even introduce themselves to me or my husband and proceeded to place their feet (and shoes) on our furniture. I wanted to be a gracious host, but I admit I was steamed by this lack of respect for my home.

I would like to communicate to my friends who WERE invited and brought these people that I don't appreciate the casual nature of their behavior, but how do I do this and not offend the friend?

GENTLE READER: By not inviting them to your next party. If they seem offended, you can say that this is just for your friends, and you know that they have other friends to entertain.

What puzzles Miss Manners is that you are characterizing them as "casual," in contrast to their friends, of whom you say they failed to respect your house. Casual is a word that many people mistakenly believe to mean (when applied to themselves) "charmingly unpretentious." It is at least as disrespectful to march other people into your party and even fail to introduce them (that was their job, not their friends') as to put feet on the furniture.

:

life

Smelly Foods Get No Frequent Flier Miles

Miss Manners by by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
by Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
Miss Manners | February 5th, 2008

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I have noticed a disturbing trend in airline travel: Passengers are increasingly bringing food on airplanes. This is understandable, given the inadequate amount of sustenance, if any, provided by the airlines. However, I do believe some manners and social customs should govern what kinds of food are appropriate for passengers to carry on an airplane.

To help, I would like to suggest a rule: Bringing odorous meals on an airplane is rude and socially unacceptable. Granola bars are benign, but french fries are offensive. Grapes are harmless, but pizza slices are impertinent. And so on.

Perhaps I am being a bit sensitive, as one friend has already suggested, but I leave it for you to make that determination. Before you do, I must add that this rule will not only free passengers and airline employees from feeling as if they are trapped in a flying pizza oven, but may also have the salutary effect of encouraging people to pursue a healthier lifestyle. But again, this is for you to decide and I now defer to your judgment.

GENTLE READER: The Law of the Air, as Miss Manners recognizes it, is "Try to stay out of my space and I'll try to stay out of yours."

You may notice that the wording is rather loose for an etiquette rule. This is because passenger space keeps getting smaller, and we may all soon be sitting in one another's laps instead of just leaning back on one another like fallen dominoes.

Thank you for pointing out that pungent food odors should be added to the list of things that should not be allowed to intrude on fellow passengers. These include noise, body parts and tales of woe. But Miss Manners must remind you that supervising other people's nutrition is also on that list.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Two friends of ours are expecting a baby to be born about a month before the date of our marriage. I want to make it clear that their child is welcome at our wedding, if they want to bring him/her.

I know the correct way to do this is to address the envelope to both parents and child, but since we don't know the gender or (obviously) the name of the expected baby, I ended up just writing "Mr. and Mrs. X and family," which seemed wrong. They did RSVP for all three of them, so obviously understood what I was trying to express; but is there a less impersonal way I could have addressed the envelope?

GENTLE READER: It is difficult to get personal with someone who has not yet made an appearance in this world. Miss Manners only hopes you did not succeed too well in your effort at being inclusive, and lead your friends to believe that the entire extended family was encouraged to show up.

It would have been gracious of you to wait until the baby was born, and then to add to your congratulatory letter "and we do hope you will bring little Zoe to the wedding."

:

Next up: More trusted advice from...

  • Environmentally Smart Gardening
  • Gardening by Design
  • Small but Mighty Bulbs
  • 7 Day Menu Planner for May 22, 2022
  • 7 Day Menu Planner for May 15, 2022
  • 7 Day Menu Planner for May 08, 2022
  • The Gift of a Garden
  • Imagine Taking AP Tests on Christmas Day
  • Dealing With Grief Around Mother's Day
UExpressLifeParentingHomePetsHealthAstrologyOdditiesA-Z
AboutContactSubmissionsTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
©2022 Andrews McMeel Universal