DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: I’m writing because I’ve been stuck in a mental loop that’s slowly poisoning the way I see myself and how I experience desire.
I don’t have abs. I do have a trained, athletic body, but not one that’s visibly “shredded” or visually striking in the stereotypical way. And here’s where my problem starts: I’ve had sex, relationships, and women who desired me — but almost always after they got to know me.
On paper, that should feel validating. In reality, it doesn’t.
What it ends up reinforcing in my head is the idea that my body alone doesn’t inspire desire. That I’m not wanted at first glance. That my attractiveness only “activates” once I prove myself through personality, presence, intelligence, confidence, or charm. In other words, I feel like I always have to demonstrate something to earn desire.
My ex-girlfriend once told me she fell in love with me because of the way I walked. And instead of feeling good about that, my mind twisted it into something darker — like my physical body itself was irrelevant or disposable, and only the performance mattered.
I’ve never experienced what I imagine as raw, visual desire: the look from a woman at a rave, on the beach, or across a room that says “I want you” without context. And I’ve internalized that absence as proof that I’m lacking something fundamental as a man.
Intellectually, I know this is a distorted belief. Emotionally, it feels deeply ingrained. It makes me feel like a man who must always compensate, always earn, always prove — never simply be desired.
I want to get this schema out of my head. It’s not motivating me; it’s corroding me. I don’t want to measure my worth through imaginary abs or an idealized version of instant visual validation.
How do I dismantle this belief without gaslighting myself? How do I stop equating “being interesting” with “not being desirable”?
Thanks for the work you do, and for reading this.
Best regards,
Feeling Trapped
DEAR FEELING TRAPPED: Women have looked at you like a piece of raw meat, FT; the problem is that you don’t believe it when it happens. You have dismissed the ways that people are into you because you don’t want to believe it’s possible. Until that changes, you’re not going to see it; your confirmation bias is going to tell you that it wasn’t “real”, that it wasn’t about your body or that you’re clearly getting it wrong.
Want proof? Ok… so tell me something: why is telling yourself that you’re desirable, not just as a person but as a piece of meat gaslighting, but “you must look like a Heated Rivalry body double to be desired” isn’t?
Seriously. That’s it in a nutshell. You have already declared that trying to believe anything else is “gaslighting”, which is precisely how you’re going to shut down any chance of changing. Do you see how that’s you closing off the possibility that your mindset is wrong?
That’s why this the place to start. Why are you willing to only accept the worst about yourself as the honest truth, but the belief that people are warm for your form as it is now are delusions and lies? Who is telling you this and, critically, why do you listen to them?
I’m not asking this rhetorically; I’m asking because I want you to actually sit down and dig into why you’ve taken this belief onboard to such a degree that you don’t believe the women you’ve dated who wanted to fuck you until the bed collapsed into splinters. And then I want you to explain to me how they weren’t actually having sex with your body and were only blowing your mind.
Seriously. Re-read your own letter and tell me why someone who thought that the way you walk was what made her fall for you isn’t responding to your body. Have you perfected some mystical technique where you are walking without physical form? Are you just projecting the illusion of locomotion, muscular contractions, and inverse kinematics through sheer psychic power? Or was it the way that you moved your body, much like how dancing is moving your body.
The answer, ultimately, is because you’re looking for a very specific form of validation. You feel like there’s a way that people are “supposed” to be into you, and the idea that context is needed – people needing to get to know you, learn who you are and realize that damn that turns them on – doesn’t “count”. It doesn’t “count”, because you don’t see yourself as being attractive, especially in that very narrow and specific way. You’re buying into a particular idea of how attraction works and I’m willing to bet you $5 cash that most of this comes from men talking about what women find attractive, rather than listening to women.
Women have shown you, time and again, that they lust for you. You aren’t willing to accept it because you feel as though it needs to come in a very specific context, but that’s not a context that actually exists. Not unless you ignore that attraction isn’t inherently and exclusively physical.
Let’s put it another way: when is the last time you wanted to fuck a piece of art? I mean it; when is the last time you looked at, say, The Venus of Arles, The Veiled Maiden or Cupid and Psyche and thought “man, I want to hit that?” Have you looked at Botticelli’s Birth of Venus or even a print of Hildebrandt’s “Unicorn Dreams” and got even a half-chub?
Ok maybe art isn’t your thing, so let’s think about photography instead. When is the last time you have gotten aroused looking at a photo of an attractive nude woman who is just standing straight in a t-pose, arms at 90 degrees to her torso, eyes looking straight forward and a completely neutral expression on her face. There’s no sign of emotion, personality, no sign that she has ever moved, ever.��Or perhaps you should picture a realistic sex doll – one that is functionally indistinguishable from a flesh-and-blood woman, but who just stands there, arms at her side, looking at nothing. Just a physical body, occupying space. Or maybe she’s just lying flat and unresponsive on a bed, a physical form with no indication of life beyond not showing signs of death or decay.
Sure, if that’s the first time you’ve ever seen boobs, it might stir something… but you have to admit, that’s a pretty unerotic image, yeah? The proportions and symmetry is nice, her features are appealing, but nothing about it is going to really inspire feelings of lust.
That’s because there’s more to desire than just meat. Meat, no matter how attractive, is just meat. It’s the spark of life that makes someone desirable – the indications of personality and emotion. There is a reason why Playboy pictorials aren’t just nude people in neutral poses; everything is about implying personality and motion. The coy look and teasing smile suggest awareness that she knows that you’re looking and she likes it. The arch of a back and closed eyes while her hands are placed as though she were running them down her body give a feeling of not just motion but sensual enjoyment – leaving the viewer with the feeling that she is someone who enjoys the physical sensations of hands touching her skin.
In other words: it’s not just her body that’s turning you on, it’s her attitude and personality, the impression of her sexuality and the desire that she feels. It’s all part of the sum totality of who she is, implied in visual short-hand that conveys volumes of meaning in a simple gesture, quirk of the lip and glance to the camera.
Even when the person is a complete stranger or is completely anonymous, you’re filling in the blanks yourself, inventing a person out of posture, pose and facial expression and imagining interacting with her. It’s not just a body, but the person… even if all you are interested in is her physicality.
It’s why a nude model in a life-drawing class isn’t inherently erotic, no matter whether she looks like Sydney Sweeney or Dame Judi Dench. Context, personality, motion… all of these have to come together to trigger that sense of attraction and desire. You aren’t only being aroused by the body, but the holistic person.
Once you understand that – stale jokes about male sexuality aside – that you’re not attracted by physical form alone, is it really that hard to believe that women too are aroused by context?
I mean, women aren’t thirsting after Michael B. Jordan on looks alone, it’s his looks in context with what they think about him. If he were just a motionless, personality-less body like an inactive Host from Westworld… it’s a very different picture.
But maybe it’s unfair to refer to someone who is stupidly hot as an example. Let’s look at, say, Paul Potts instead. Potts, a contestant in the first season of Britain’s Got Talent is a dumpy, kinda chubby guy who, charitably, isn’t going to grace the cover of Men’s Health any time soon. But if you watch his audition on BGT’s official YouTube channel, you can see the way Amanda Holden’s impression of him visibly changes at the 1:05 mark. However, it’s the moment at 2:05 where things peak, because Nessun Dorma isn’t the only thing that’s reached a climax. Holden hasn’t just changed her impression of him, she’s going to need a change of clothes. Potts may not be the most physically impressive guy, but his voice is powerful and beautiful enough to make people fall for him.
The point is that attraction and arousal isn’t just physical, it’s contextual. Changing the context changes the association and the feelings the person inspires, because it hits that person’s buttons just right. When that context changes, it changes how people feel, and how they feel changes how they see the person. This isn’t just feel-good woo-woo bulls--t, there’s actual science behind it; the more we get to know a person, the more attractive we find them.
So yes, your ex, who loved your walk loved your body… in this case, specifically how you moved your body. That’s not “earning” desire, that’s inspiring desire. That’s someone going “hold on, did it get hot in here” and fanning themselves because they suddenly got hit by a wave of lust.
I know you’ve felt this way too. Be honest – can you really say that you’ve never realized you were hot for someone after you got to know them? Or do you want all of us to believe that you and you alone only fall in lust at first sight and nothing ever shifts that for you? Have you never seen someone you knew in different context and suddenly realized that holy s--t they’re hot? Do you only get hornt up immediately upon seeing someone and never later on?
The point of all of this is that you have been drawn to people because of their holistic selves, not just because of their body. You have almost certainly had times when your attraction to them wasn’t instant, but came after you got to know them. Would you consider your desire for them to be less, if it wasn’t immediate and instant?
If you are capable of accepting that you are capable of being turned on by someone after you got to know them and that this wasn’t them “earning” or “proving” themselves to you, then why doesn’t that apply to them, too?
If you paid attention to women and who they’re into and didn’t dismiss their opinions as fake, misleading or outright lying, you might be surprised. Some women like the Greek statue look. Others would let Matt Berry do any depraved things he wanted because they think he’s just that hot. Go to any forum with lots of women and do a search for “hear me out”, and you’ll be astounded at who and what women think are unspeakably desirable and why.
There comes a point where you have to either accept that the people who love and desire you are doing so because you’re you, with everything that means. That doesn’t mean that you had to “prove” anything or “earn” their desire, not more than women have had to “prove” themselves to you or “earn” your desire.
If you want to change this belief, you have to be willing to change how you feel about yourself. Part of that is going to be accepting that maybe you’re wrong about what women want or how they feel about you. Another part is going to be letting go of the ways you reinforce the belief that you aren’t attractive. This includes not listening to the men who insist they know women better than women do and listening to the women who are saying “yes, yes, OH GOD YES.”
Until then… well, you’re going to be with women who want to climb you like a tree and you’re going to keep calling them liars.
Up to you, my guy.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com