DEAR READERS: The continuing news reports about the Trump administration's dismantling of environmental protections -- primarily, cutting back on regulations in order to eliminate compliance costs for various polluting industries -- should be a wake-up call for all citizens. Putting profits before public health and the environment is an unconscionable crime against humanity.
The latest instance is the Environmental Protection Agency's abandonment of a rule that would have strengthened limits on fine-particle pollution. The particles in question come from burning fossil fuels -- notably from vehicular traffic, oil refineries and power plants. They can exacerbate asthma and have been linked to heart attack, stroke and lung cancer. Their potential contribution to Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases is also considerable. The public health costs of this change far outweigh the savings to polluters.
According to the EPA, these particles "can be carried over long distances by wind and then settle on (the) ground or water. Depending on their chemical composition, the effects of this settling may include: making lakes and streams acidic, changing the nutrient balance in coastal waters and large river basins, depleting the nutrients in soil, damaging sensitive forests and farm crops, affecting the diversity of ecosystems, and contributing to acid rain effects."
For more details, visit: epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm.
The impact of these fine particles on wildlife, especially in the burning of the Amazon forest, may play a significant role in many species' declining numbers. Air pollutants can poison wildlife, causing endocrine function disruption, organ injury, increased vulnerability to stresses and diseases, lower reproductive success and even death.
For more details, visit: canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/air-pollution/quality-environment-economy/ecosystem/wild-animals.html.
On Jan. 27, the U.S. withdrew from the Paris agreement on climate change, becoming the only country in the world to abandon its commitment to slow global warming. Climate change is not a “hoax,” as many claim, but a reality, and extreme climatic events cost the U.S. billions of dollars annually.
Rather than bringing more federal police into America’s cities and allowing ever-more petroleum-burning traffic, it would be prudent to bring in more trees. We should restore our forests and construct towers of irrigated greenery to improve air quality and public health.
The traditional Japanese practice of forest bathing (deliberately spending time in nature) is good for our health because forests are cooler and less polluted than cities. Researchers suggest that the misty air near sources of moving water, such as forest streams, can inundate us with beneficial microbes and charged ions. Also, the phytoncides that plants release, which give wood its smell and repel certain parasites, might also have immune benefits for people. For details, visit: nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00105-x.
Some readers may recall the "deep ecology" movement and one of its founders, John Seed. I recommend the 1988 book he co-authored, "Thinking Like a Mountain: Towards a Council of All Beings."
DOGS AS DISEASE DETECTORS
We know that dogs can help heal us emotionally, and that some of them can sense when we are physically ill. Anecdotes abound about dogs "sniffing out" cancer in a human before a diagnosis was made. But now, dogs can help other dogs!
Five dogs previously trained to detect the scents of human and animal diseases correctly identified 70% of blood serum samples from dogs with hemangiosarcoma, suggesting that trained dogs could effectively screen other dogs for the aggressive cancer, according to a study in The Veterinary Journal. The findings also suggest that hemangiosarcoma has a distinct scent profile, and that identifying specific compounds associated with the disease could lead to the development of an “electronic nose” for annual screenings, says veterinarian Cynthia Otto, director of the Penn Vet Working Dog Center. (Full story: University of Pennsylvania, Jan. 15)
FAMILY DOGS MAY ALTER TEENS’ MICROBIOMES
Owning a dog may support adolescents’ mental health by altering their microbiomes. Researchers found that 13-year-olds with a dog at home had lower delinquency and aggression scores than their peers who didn’t have dogs. Saliva samples from dog owners contained more Streptococcus and Prevotella species; a higher abundance of Streptococcus has been linked to a lower likelihood of delinquent behavior.
See the study "Dog ownership during adolescence alters the microbiota and improves mental health" by Eiji Miyauchi et al., published in iScience, December 2025.
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)