DEAR DR. FOX: I am truly baffled by “animal rescuers” who have convinced themselves that humane euthanasia is the worst thing that can happen to a companion animal. They surely have not seen the tragedies that I have been forced to witness.
This “no-kill” movement has swept our country, virtually closing open-admission shelters and ensuring that many more dogs and cats are simply dumped by the roadside. These animals will still die, but are now made to suffer untold horrors first.
I served on the board of directors of one such no-kill group until I sadly realized that the individuals practicing TND (trap-neuter-dump) were doing more harm than good. There is a multitude of ways that these animals will suffer before taking their final breaths.
I hope that you can encourage your readers to think about the sad, but inescapable, conclusion that these cats and dogs are ultimately going to die. The only question should be: Do we make them suffer for extended periods first, just so that we feel better? -- J.M., Cincinnati, Ohio
DEAR J.M.: I have addressed this issue in past columns and it does need revisiting. I link this “no-kill” movement to the pro-life sentiment that actually kills compassionate responsibility for abandoned and surrendered cats and dogs.
Thousands of cats are being neutered, vaccinated against rabies and then released to fend for themselves. Those who do not survive by killing songbirds and other wildlife for food will be assured a slow death from starvation, exposure and disease. Other no-kill shelters simply warehouse dogs and cats, whose quality of life is abysmal at best. A sickening version of this are the pet hoarders who take more stray animals into their homes than they can properly care for.
I sympathize with shelter staff who would prefer not to have to humanely euthanize animals that are not adopted, but that is a responsible act for a largely irresponsible community of pet owners.
For more details, see these posts on my website: drfoxonehealth.com/post/outdoor-cats-wildlife-and-human-health and drfoxonehealth.com/post/dogs-in-shelters-temperament-tests-exercise-issues.
RECALLED: COUNTRY VET, HEARTLAND HARVEST PET TREATS
Consumers Supply Distributing has recalled 4-pound bags of Country Vet Biscuits and Heartland Harvest Dog Biscuits that may be contaminated with salmonella. The products have an expiration date of Sept. 6, 2026, and were sold in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska and Texas. (Full story: KECI-TV, Montana, Jan. 1)
ILLINOIS VETS CAN GRANT RABIES VACCINE EXEMPTIONS
A new law in Illinois allows veterinarians to grant rabies vaccine exemptions for pets at risk of health complications. The law formalizes a practice that veterinarians have long followed. “There are certain animals where vaccination could pose serious health concerns ... (such as) animals that have severe anaphylactic reactions to vaccination. While rare, it does happen,” said Kate Brucker, president of the Illinois State Veterinary Medical Association. (Full story: thecentersquare.com, Dec. 31)
All states should allow veterinary discretion on this issue, since a total vaccination mandate can put some animals at risk. But I am not an anti-vaxxer, since the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the risks for both companion animals and people.
MORE RABIES CONCERNS IN THE NEWS
A dog in Chicago is the first in Illinois to test positive for rabies since 1994. The dog had been vaccinated in June, but might have had contact with a rabid animal prior to vaccination. The dog was euthanized due to behavioral issues on Dec. 18 and then tested for rabies.
Clinical signs of rabies infection can take up to a year to develop. Public health officials are investigating the specific strain of rabies identified, and are assessing people who had contact with the dog to determine whether post-exposure prophylaxis is needed. (Full story: WMAQ-TV, Chicago, Dec. 22)
A family in Perry Township, Pennsylvania, faced significant challenges after being bitten by a semi-feral cat that later tested positive for rabies, exposing gaps in the state’s animal control system. The family struggled to get the cat tested for rabies and get treatment for themselves, ultimately incurring tens of thousands of dollars in medical costs. Pennsylvania’s piecemeal approach to animal control divides responsibilities among agencies, often leaving residents without clear guidance or support. (Full story: PennLive.com, Dec. 22)
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)