DEAR DR. FOX: I was disturbed by a CNN reporter's statement concerning the search-and-rescue dogs working in the Moore, Okla., tornado wreckage: "The dogs, brave dogs going into these homes and buildings, some of them stepping on the nails and other dangerous debris here." What are your thoughts on this? It seems like animal abuse to me. -- W.M., Arlington, Va.

DEAR W.M.: There is no excuse for not providing these dogs with protective boots and body wraps to help prevent injuries to their undersides and flanks. Military dogs are provided with such protective gear, and animals handled by civilian services should likewise be properly attired to help minimize injury and incapacitation. In his study of injuries and illnesses in search-and-rescue dogs, published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Dr. Lon E. Gordon notes, "Federal Emergency Management Agency guidelines for training of search-and-rescue dogs stress the need for traction on rubble piles. It is plausible that searches in areas of little to no rubble, such as homes searched in response to Hurricane Katrina, could be safely conducted by dogs wearing booties."

Susannah Charleson, canine search-and-rescue team member and author of the new and inspiring book "The Possibility Dogs," sent me the following statement: "Safety for the search dogs is a serious concern for all of us who work with loved, respected K-9 partners. Operational gear for the dogs, like body wraps and boots, certainly needs to protect from puncture injuries, (while) at the same time it doesn't raise the risk of heat stroke, entanglement and serious slip/fall accidents. Debris dogs often work 'naked' to lessen the risk of hanging or binding a dog, and disaster sites often present a tough call. There's been quite a bit of research and development for this kind of gear, particularly since 9/11, and there are boots, vests, goggles and so on that some handlers swear by and others have had reason to mistrust. I think most of us would love to see protection available that really functions as it needs to, allowing the dog to do a strong, sure-footed job without compromising the ability to balance, maneuver and ventilate."

So I appeal to all concerned to get some good gear designed for these dogs to be used with greater regularity when they are at work.

DEAR DR. FOX: I am hoping you can help me understand this cat behavior: I adopted two lovely female ragamuffin cats about 2 1/2 years ago from a rescue site; they were about 8 months old. I was told they were sisters.

I noticed Leeza was the dominant one. Sissy would let Leeza eat some of her treats if Leeza finished first. Leeza did not want to be approached and was very skittish. Sissy would follow me around like a dog and was very vocal, greeting me when I came home and sitting on my lap when I watched TV. Leeza would stretch out on the floor with her legs in the air and mew quietly, but when I approached her, she would run off.

Recently, after reading an interesting a book about cat personalities, I decided that when Leeza stretched out, put her legs in the air and mewed, she probably wanted me to pet her. I crawled slowly toward her, and she allowed me to pet her and very much enjoyed it.

Now Sissy is not following me around, won't greet me at the door, acts standoffish and hides in another room. She is eating less. Leeza has become my shadow and is the vocal one, constantly stretching out on the floor and mewing for attention while Sissy is off hiding somewhere. It is almost as though there was a shift in personalities.

I feel bad for Sissy. I have petted them both when they are near one another, but it is as though Sissy is a dejected cat. Tell me what more I can do to show both of them that they are loved equally. -- B.L.C., Washington, D.C.

DEAR B.L.C.: What you describe is something very feline in terms of how cats react to attention -- you can call it jealousy, competitive social dominance or displacement. Encouraging your cats to interact playfully with a lure on a string or grooming them in turn may help bring the triangle of your two-cat family and you together. My e-book "Understanding Your Cat" may give you other helpful insights that cats have taught me over the years.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox's website at DrFoxVet.com.)

Imagine living in a world or time when the authorities condoned the random killing of your family members and relatives. They called it a "recreational sport" and made money selling licenses to kill. Number-crunching experts called it a "sustainable harvest" that was a "science-based decision."

Consider how you would you feel, unable to defend your family from an annual slaughter by those who know nothing about how you grieve over the loss of loved ones. Nor do they know or care that you might barely survive the hardships of shattered family and community ties when members are crippled and killed and all who survive begin to live in fear.

This is how it is for the gray wolf residents of the United States, whose annual shooting, trapping and snaring amounts to a kind of death tax for the privilege of being allowed to exist rather than being exterminated, which many people have devoutly wished and sought to accomplish for centuries. Now the U.S. government is proposing to remove all legal protection of these wolves by removing them from the endangered species list.

Those people who are not incapable of putting themselves in the wolf's place, along with those wolf biologists and other scientists who value the wolf primarily as a species playing a vital role in maintaining and restoring healthy ecosystems, sought to put an end to this extermination by having the federal government add the gray wolf to the endangered species list in 1974. But the government is now bowing to pressure from various states and vested interest groups (such as cattle ranchers and deer hunters) and is being swayed by state and federal number-crunching wolf biologists and trappers like Minnesota's David Mech, who speaks the distancing and sentience-denying language of "harvesting" sustainably managed wolf populations. These authorities contend that the gray wolf has "recovered," with an estimated population of some 6,100, and no longer needs to be protected as an endangered species.

The numbers game plays into the outmoded and unscientific federal and state wildlife management paradigm of favored species such as white-tailed deer, elk, turkey and fur-bearers such as the wolf and bobcat for recreational and commercial purposes. This is a form of wildlife farming, rather than seeking to maximize species diversity for optimal ecosystem integrity and health. Wildlife agencies contend that the best way to protect the wolf is to manage it as a trophy species with strictly enforced annual kill quotas. But there is no scientifically valid reason for not continuing to prohibit all such killing for the good of the ecosystems where wolves once flourished across much of the country and now are in dire need of CPR -- conservation, protection and restoration. From this latter perspective, the western and eastern gray wolf populations in North America have certainly not recovered, a far greater number being needed to help maximize species diversity and the restoration and recovery of ecosystem integrity and health.

Laid bare of the prejudices generated by folktales and mythology imbued with fear and ignorance, the wolf is more akin to the human species, emotionally, socially and ecologically, than the human species is to its closest genetic cousin, the chimpanzee. Some anthropologists believe that wolves helped make us human, a view shared by Native Americans through their lessons of pack loyalty, strategic cooperation in hunting, food-sharing, communal care of young, documented care of injured family members and living in balance under the constraints of natural law.

Our humanity is as endangered today as the wolf. Selective killing as a money-making and job-creating management tool, and killing wolves as a recreational "sporting challenge" must become things of the past if we are to evolve as a species and put compassion and ethics, along with sound science and governance, in place of continued harm and destruction of all that is wild and free.

There will be a 90-day comment period on the American government's intention to remove all protection for the gray wolf. Information and notices will be posted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services website (fws.gov) this week. Make your concerns known and go through the motions regardless of the evident resistance to democratic process and environmental justice that prevails in this society today.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox's website at www.twobitdog.com/DrFox.)

�PAGE �

DEAR DR. FOX: There is an American bulldog named Daisy who lives in the neighborhood. She has a tumor hanging from her belly that drains and bleeds at times. She always comes to my house to sleep in my three doggies' beds. I love her and allow her to do this, and I wash the blanket each time she goes home.

Is the draining and bleeding dangerous for my dogs? I have mentioned this to her owner, but he refuses to put her down. Daisy does not want to be alone, and she seems scared. I am sad and heartbroken for her cancer, and knowing my dogs won't get sick will help me. -- L.S., Hendersonville, N.C.

DEAR L.S.: I appreciate your concern over your neighbor's poor dog. My guess is that this is either an ulcerated breast tumor or a fatty tumor -- a lipoma. If it is the latter, then surgical removal should fix the problem. But if it is a neglected mammary tumor, chances are that it has spread to her lungs and other parts of her body, so surgery would not be a cure. It may temporarily make her life more comfortable, but she may not survive the surgery.

Either way, if you have the funds, talk to the owner, who may need financial or emotional support -- and possibly a kick in the rump to do something for the dog.

The oozing from the growth is not likely to put your dogs at risk, but you would be wise to bleach-clean any towels you put down for her to rest on when she visits. You can clean her up with diluted hydrogen peroxide or a hand sanitizer solution.

I find such neglect appalling, and calling the local animal shelter or a veterinarian to come and evaluate the dog when she is visiting may be a good idea.

UPDATE FROM THE ORIGINAL LETTER WRITER:

DEAR DR. FOX: I took your reply to my letter of concern about this poor dog to her owner, and he was not offended -- he just felt helpless, I guess. He took Daisy to the vet, and she was euthanized. Her suffering was immense and her condition was considered too advanced for surgery to be successful. Thank you. -- L.S.

DEAR DR. FOX: I have two indoor cats. Neither is any specific breed, they're just farm cats that became indoor cats.

One cat, Spot, has bladder problems. He has to eat Hill's Prescription Diet c/d so he doesn't develop bladder stones. Our other cat, China Doll, has some sort of bacteria in her intestines that causes severe diarrhea. She is on Hill's Prescription Diet i/d. Because of these two diets, I have to feed the cats three times a day and hover over them to make sure they eat the right food.

Is there any food I can buy or make that would be safe for both of them? I would rather let food be available for them all day instead of making them scarf food down at specific times.

Thanks for all of your help! -- J.W.R., Sarasota, Fla.

DEAR J.W.R.: As you have discovered, it is difficult supervising two cats who must both be on special prescribed diets.

The cat with the bowel problems can be given good-quality, human-grade probiotics mixed in with her food. You can feed both of them my home-prepared diet, which you can find on my website, drfoxvet.com.

Encourage both to drink plenty of water by seasoning it with a little low- or no-salt chicken or beef bullion. Check feline-nutrition.org for more insights on the correct feeding of cats and how one good nutritional formula can help cats with a range of health problems associated with manufactured cat foods, including special prescription diets!

Many cats diagnosed with a bladder problem turn out to be allergic to corn, and high-cereal diets are largely responsible for one type of bladder stone that is appearing in epidemic numbers. Cats with chronic diarrhea are frequently suffering from a food intolerance or allergy. What may seem like a bacterial infection in some cases of diarrhea may well be dysbiosis (bacterial imbalance), which can be rectified with various supplements, using antibiotics as a last resort.

(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.

Visit Dr. Fox's website at DrFoxVet.com.)