DEAR MISS MANNERS: I’ve seen young men with their mothers picking out a ring that the young woman of his choice is supposed to love and wear forever.
What if they picked something she really didn’t like?
I would like to propose a new tradition: The proposal is made and accepted, but instead of a ring, the proposer offers a jewel box that contains a diamond, or a stone that the newly minted bride-to-be likes, and an appointment time at a jeweler to select the setting that suits the wearer and the proposer’s budget.
The proposer should have already found out what type of stone is desired and the shape of the stone. The proposer can then choose the stone that fits the budget and will please its wearer. Often jewelers allow the stone to be replaced with a larger one and the price is discounted by the cost of the original stone.
GENTLE READER: Point taken. But rather than send those gentlemen around evaluating stones they know nothing about, Miss Manners would like to propose the revival of an older tradition.
Before a ring became a prop in performance art proposals, it was not considered necessary to present one at the time -- or at all. The offer of marriage was thought to be exciting enough.
Besides, what was the gentleman supposed to do with an expensive purchase if he were not accepted?
Presuming success, he might offer her a family ring, if he were fortunate enough to have one. (Admittedly, that would be hard to decline, but the lady could always say later that it was so precious to her that she would not risk losing it, therefore wearing it only on special occasions.)
Absent a family ring, however, the accepted suitor would make a private visit to a jeweler beforehand and set aside a selection of rings in his price range. Presuming success, there would then be a delightful excursion when he brought her to make her choice.