DEAR MISS MANNERS: I'd like to get your opinion on children's preprinted thank-you notes. I've seen a few where the body is printed out, but the child is required to fill in only the names of the giver, the gift andhis or her name.

I think this is a good way to initiate my 3- and 5-year-olds to the etiquette of expressing gratitude for a gift, but my mother thinks they are impersonal and insulting, since they are not handwritten (by either me or the child).

I feel they are an appropriate way to teach children who are capable only of writing their names properly to thank someone who has been kind enough to give them a gift, and feel it is more personal than my writing a note and the child signing it, as it is obvious the effort has not been made entirely by them. What is your opinion?

GENTLE READER: That you are teaching your children to send thank-you letters is admirable. But why are you not teaching them how to compose them?

"Because they can't write," you respond, politely refraining (Miss Manners hopes) from adding, "Duh."

True. You may have to do the actual writing. But you can teach them to do the thinking. Form letters are not cute, even from toddlers.

You should be questioning the children to extract the essentials of a letter of thanks: a specific, favorable reaction to the present; an expression of gratitude; and a bit of chattiness to establish the idea that it is not just the present that is valued, but the relationship.

This is not going to be easy. Any expressions of delight when opening the package should be noted, but those are not apt to be especially articulate. So the process goes something like this:

Parent: "What can we tell Aunt Tilda about how much you like the sweater?"

Child: "I wanted a fire truck."

Parent: "I know. But it's your favorite color. Isn't purple your favorite color?"

Child: "Maybe."

Parent: "What can you tell your aunt about what you've been doing?"

Child: "Nothing special."

Parent: "Sure you did. We went to the museum, remember? What did we see?"

Child: "The food court."

Parent: "Yes, but what else? Remember the dinosaurs? What were they like?"

Eventually, you can put together something that the child vaguely recognizes as his. And -- even more eventually -- it will teach him how to write a letter of thanks.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Please settle a good-natured bet between my husband and me. If I have acquaintances who have put their house up for sale, is it rude to ask them their asking price if we all know I have no interest in buying it?

Nor do I have any intention of buying or selling a house at all. Really, I just want to know out of curiosity. For the record, I think it's rude, akin to asking someone their salary. My husband, on the other hand, says it's fine.

GENTLE READER: Asking out of mere curiosity would indeed be rude. You need a better reason.

Fortunately, Miss Manners can supply you with one (in case you can't figure out how to look for the listing online). You can pose as being helpful by saying, "In case I know anyone who might be interested in buying your house, how much are you asking?"

(Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com; to her email, dearmissmanners@gmail.com; or through postal mail to Miss Manners, Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106.)

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband and I received a good bottle of red wine from friends as a thank-you for a favor we did for their family. We brought that bottle of wine with us to my sister's house for Christmas dinner.

My brother-in-law made prime rib for dinner. We asked him to serve the bottle with dinner. He chose not to and explained that his bottle of wine went better with the meal.

We felt slighted since we really wanted to try the wine. After the meal was over and we were all still at the table, again we asked him to open it. He declined with another excuse.

Here we are, days later, and they kept the bottle of wine. Should we ask for it back? I know my friends will ask us how we enjoyed the wine, and I don't know how to tell them that we didn't and admit that we no longer have it.

GENTLE READER: That one bottle of wine certainly had a lot of strings attached to it.

Some friends gave it to you, but are expected to demand a report back on it.

You then gave it away, with the unmet demand that it be substituted for the wine your hosts had chosen to complement the dinner they had planned. Now you feel you should tug on a string to bring back the bottle that, for all you know, may have been given to your friends by others who required a report, which they were planning to base on your assessment.

Miss Manners begs you to let go. You gave it away. There was no obligation on the part of the people to whom you gave it either to pour it down your throat or to return it.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I've asked my adult niece to call me "Aunt (my nickname)." All my other adult nieces and nephews address me like that, but this niece has said she's not sure she can honor my request because she says I am trying to control the way she communicates with me and show she is subservient to me.

Ironically, when she was about 10 years old she asked family members to stop calling her by her nickname and address her by her given first name. I have complied since day one to her name request, because I feel strongly that one should address people as they prefer to be addressed.

Am I asking too much for her to return the favor or, for that matter, to be addressed as I like to be addressed? She would like to call me only by my nickname, which disappoints me. I could call her by her nickname, but I don't think two wrongs make a right.

GENTLE READER: Your niece is being what we used to call impertinent. Actually, Miss Manners still considers -- and calls -- it that when a young lady claims to feel degraded when expected to show respect for her aunt, who is probably also her elder, and asking merely for the same courtesy she accorded the niece.

(Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com; to her email, dearmissmanners@gmail.com; or through postal mail to Miss Manners, Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106.)

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I have heard that it is not proper to thank people for Christmas gifts. This does not seem reasonable to me, especially when gifts have been packaged and mailed, and the giver is not present upon receipt. What is the official rule of etiquette about Christmas gifts?

GENTLE READER: Let Miss Manners guess where you are getting your etiquette information.

The subject arose with someone under an obligation to thank either you or another benefactor, such as that person's grandmother. When you mentioned that, there was a counterattack in the form of a declaration that such an expectation was selfish, because true generosity exists for itself, not with any thought of being thanked.

Got that? The person who gave the present is condemned as ignoble by the very person who benefited but wouldn't trouble to acknowledge it. Miss Manners trusts that you are not so naive as to fall for such sophistry.

Generosity and gratitude are permanently paired. Those would-be etiquetteers who declare expressing thanks to be no longer required have done only half the job. They must also then abolish the custom of giving -- or, what always turns out to be the case with them -- accepting presents.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am married with two children, 14 and 4. My 4-year-old son is currently in treatment for cancer.

My family has been very supportive and kind. One of my sisters, who has no children and a lucrative career, usually shows up for a visit with very expensive gifts for the 4-year-old. This Christmas season, she has been more extravagant than usual, I assume as a result of my son's illness.

I have gently suggested that she should come for a visit with no gifts, so that my son appreciates her presence more than her "presents." She was offended at the suggestion. Is there any polite way to limit her gifts?

GENTLE READER: Probably not. Buying them is a comfort to your sister.

What you can do is to use the presents to encourage a bond between them. "Oh, look what Aunt Sophie has brought you!" you can say. And then announce to them both that Aunt Sophie will teach him how to play the game, ride the vehicle, read him the book, or whatever.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I was raised on the East Coast in a home where we always used cloth napkins. I continue to use them. They are put back on the table and used another day.

My son and his wife were disgusted by this and said it must be a hangover from the austerity of the war years. I replace them when they seem to need it -- sometimes several days. Is he right and I am wrong?

GENTLE READER: Perhaps he has a full-time laundress, and you do not.

And perhaps he has no idea what those fanciful round silver objects are, which are often elaborate, sometimes with whimsical themes, and carry engraved names or initials.

These are called napkin rings, functional items that once appeared even in fully staffed households. (A good laundress is hard to find, and one wouldn't want to overtax her.) They are meant for family use only, never, as they are now sometimes used, as decorations for guests' napkins.

You will notice that Miss Manners is refusing to consider the possibility that a properly reared son is trying to convert his parents to paper napkins.

(Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com; to her email, dearmissmanners@gmail.com; or through postal mail to Miss Manners, Universal Uclick, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106.)