DEAR DR. BLONZ: I have eaten well, staying away from high-fat foods, but have always held that after a person reaches 80, fat intake isn’t as harmful as it is in younger years. There are foods I would like to eat more of, but the high fat content has always stopped me because of the harmful effects it can have on the body. I am now 87. Please advise if there is a difference when the 80-plus age is reached. I do not have a weight problem. I wish to thank you for any information you can give me. -- N.F., Phoenix

DEAR N.F.: You seem to have found a good road in life, and your 87 years speak volumes. Why not enjoy the foods you’d like to eat? What are you waiting for?

A general belief that dietary fat is “harmful,” for individuals at any age, is misleading and somewhat dated. What counts is the amount and types of fat in relation to the other healthful attributes of the diet. (About the only exception are trans fats, and those are finally on the run with the latest labeling changes that require their divulgence.)

Examples of foods naturally high in fat include nuts, seeds and fruits such as the avocado and olive. These plants need their fats to reproduce, and they have succeeded over the millennia because they also produce protective phytochemical compounds to keep the fats viable. In the same way, we need to be sure that our body receives essential nutrients and healthful components from whole foods as its protectors. You then fold into this recipe an active lifestyle to keep the machinery in good operating condition. It is a simple, straightforward theme, and fat ceases to be an issue when this balance is in place.

You say that your weight is not an issue, but you didn’t indicate whether there are any other health issues you might be dealing with, or if there are medications that may be a part of your daily regimen. The food issue is straightforward, but if there is a delicate balance of ongoing medical concerns, it makes sense to touch base with your health professional before you make any radical changes.

DEAR DR. BLONZ: What does it mean when an oil is “winterized”? A bottle had this listed on its ingredient statement. The store manager had no idea, so I thought I would ask you. -- O.Q., Seattle

DEAR O.Q.: Winterization is the process by which saturated fatty acids are filtered out of an oil to help it stay clear at cooler temperatures. Oils begin to turn cloudy as the temperature drops. Similar to the way that water forms ice crystals as it freezes, the fatty acids of an oil form into crystals on their way to becoming a solid block of fat. Saturated fats have the highest melting point, which means that they are the first to solidify as the temperature drops. Polyunsaturated fats, by contrast, have low melting points, so they remain clear and liquid at cooler temperatures. The winterization process chills the oil slowly and filters out some of the crystalized saturated fatty acids. This allows the oil to remain clear at cooler temperatures.

Send questions to: “On Nutrition,” Ed Blonz, c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO, 64106. Send email inquiries to questions@blonz.com. Due to the volume of mail, personal replies cannot be provided.

DEAR DR. BLONZ: I want your take on the safety of nonstick cooking sprays. What is the propellant used, and how do the sprays work? I use sprays when stir-frying vegetables or roasting a chicken, counting on it to be a healthful practice, as it’s made out to be. But my science-student daughter has advised me that these products may rely on dangerous substances, and that I should switch to straight olive oil. -- L.W., Chicago

DEAR L.W.: Aerosol cooking sprays are based on vegetable oils, such as corn, soy, canola or olive oil. Also in the mix is lecithin, an ingredient from soybeans traditionally used as an emulsifier: a substance that keeps oil and water together in a mix known as an emulsion. Finally, there will either be a pump spray device or a gas propellant.

Such sprays keep food from sticking by forming a thin oil-lecithin film between the cooking surface and the food. Very small amounts of a silicone compound and some alcohol may also be present to prevent foaming and facilitate the formation of the nonstick film. While rubbing a small amount of oil on the pan can also provide nonstick properties, the coating action of cooking sprays tends to be superior, which is especially helpful during cleanup.

Because the sprays use a minimum amount of oil, little fat is contributed to the meal. A one-second application -- an amount sufficient to cover a 10-inch skillet -- will contain less than one gram of fat. Interestingly, the Nutrition Facts labels on many of these spray products have an impractical “recommended serving” of a third of a second or less. This translates to less than a half of a gram of fat per serving, allowing the company to legally label their product as “fat-free.”

The ingredients should be clearly stated, so you can opt for a product that contains no more than the basic components. There’s nothing really unsafe in most sprays, given the small amount used. If there is a safety issue with the ingredients, it would be with aerosol sprays and their compressed-gas propellants. Some use hydrocarbons such as propane or isobutane; both are highly flammable. Such sprays should only be used on cold surfaces and kept away from all flames. There are products that don’t rely on flammable hydrocarbon gas propellants.

Always shake well before using, to thoroughly mix the ingredients. An oft-ignored drawback from the use of these products is the waste contributed by the empty aerosol can. There are refillable pump sprays that limit this waste, but the high pressure of the aerosol is what helps facilitate spray performance. If you go the homemade pump-spray route, you may have to experiment with oils, staying away from unfiltered oils with particulate matter that might clog the nozzle.

Send questions to: “On Nutrition,” Ed Blonz, c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO, 64106. Send email inquiries to questions@blonz.com. Due to the volume of mail, personal replies cannot be provided.

DEAR DR. BLONZ: There is an inconsistency I hope you will “weigh in” on. If a pound is the equivalent of 454 grams, and there are nine calories per gram of fat, this would suggest that a pound of body fat will have 4,086 calories. Please explain the common referral to a pound of fat having only 3,500 calories. The math does not add up. -- D.L., East Orange, New Jersey

DEAR D.L.: Fat is our most calorie-dense substance, and it is capable of providing an energy equivalent to nine calories per gram. It is utilized as the primary form of energy storage because humans, like other animals, need to be mobile. If our energy was stored as carbohydrate or protein, the human body would take up over twice the space it does now. Think what size pants you’d need then!

There are 454 grams in a pound, as you correctly point out. So how do we come up with 3,500 calories in a pound, when 454 x 9 = 4,086 calories? The answer rests with the fact that body fat is not pure fat. The adipose tissue that houses the stored fat contains a small amount of water and some structural material, accounting for close to 15 percent of tissue weight. It is this nonfat portion that helps explain why a pound of body fat is said to contain approximately 3,500 calories worth of stored energy.

DEAR DR. BLONZ: I enjoy almonds in many forms, including almond butter, but have been wondering if I get the same nutritional benefits from roasted and unroasted almonds. And what about fat-roasted versus dry-roasted nuts? -- P.W., via email

DEAR P.W.: The roasting of almonds, peanuts or other foods helps to bring about flavor-enhancing chemical reactions in the food. With nuts, this can be accomplished with or without oils, which can impart their own flavor notes. Dry roasting requires specially designed ovens that use heated air to do the cooking. The processor can then add salt, paprika or other flavorings as desired.

Oil roasting adds only about a gram of fat per 1-cup serving. This small difference is explained by the fact that half the weight of the nut -- and more than 70 percent of its calories -- comes from the fats already present. The addition of flavorings, depending on the type used, can affect the level. Honey-roasted nuts, for example, contain less fat per serving because some of the weight is taken up by the sugary coating.

Roasting, being a high-heat process, does destroy some of the heat-sensitive nutrients, which include thiamine and vitamin C. But don’t view this as the deciding factor, as almonds are not the go-to food for these nutrients anyway. Other nutrients are unaffected. Check the complete list of nutrients for almonds at the USDA database: ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb.

Send questions to: “On Nutrition,” Ed Blonz, c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO, 64106. Send email inquiries to questions@blonz.com. Due to the volume of mail, personal replies cannot be provided.