DEAR DR. FOX: Why are captive hunting facilities or shooting preserves still allowed? In today’s paper, there was an article about a rancher who cloned giant sheep for shooting preserves. (He was fined and given six months' prison time.) I just don’t understand why, in this day and age, these "canned hunts" are still in operation and haven’t been eliminated via legislation.
Advertisement
Just how sick can one be to shoot a typically semi-tame animal in a fenced area with no escape, all for a trophy? You’ve probably touched on this topic before, but as it was in today’s paper, I’m fired up about it. -- C.D.G., West Palm Beach, Florida
DEAR C.D.G.: I appreciate your concern. The prosecution of this rancher has been widely publicized, primarily because he illegally imported an endangered species of sheep.
From BBC.com, Oct. 1: "Arthur 'Jack' Schubarth, 81, illegally imported body parts of Marco Polo argali sheep, the world’s largest, from Kyrgyzstan, and sent the genetic material to a lab to create cloned embryos, court documents say. The cloning resulted in a single male, which he named 'Montana Mountain King,' or MMK. MMK was then used to inseminate ewes to be sold to shooting preserves, also known as captive hunting operations."
This venture was certainly expensive, and the money would have been better spent on rewilding indigenous species on ranch-land rather than engaging in this biotechnology purely for hoped-for profit.
"Canned hunts," where animals are in a large fenced area for people to come and shoot with guns or bows and arrows, are an atavistic “sport” and a sad reflection of the mental state of so many trophy and recreational hunters.
In his book “The Art of Happiness,” the Dalai Lama wrote: “Ask a hunter to visualize his favorite hunting dog being shot or caught in a trap to awaken feelings of compassion. Then he may better imagine the suffering of his prey.” Such envisioning is the way to build the bridge of empathy, enabling us to feel for others and to exercise our moral freedom of choice to act responsibly.
To take pleasure in the hunt and the kill, and to enjoy wearing furs from animals that were snared and trapped, are antithetical to the ethics of a subsistence way of life that was sustainable for millennia in our gatherer-hunter past. Now our children are corrupted by the values of consumerism and of treating other sentient beings as objects and commodities rather than as subjects of community.
CATS CAN PROVIDE MENTAL HEALTH BENEFITS
Pet ownership does not guarantee mental health benefits, of course, but studies have shown that spending time with cats can relieve anxiety for people who have chronic mental health conditions, says Howard Liu, chair of the American Psychiatric Association’s Council on Communications. “Having a cat can help people feel connected and gives them a daily routine that can be helpful for both the person and their pet,” Liu said. (Full story: Good Housekeeping, Oct. 12)
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)